Hi,
tmorin and myself won't be available for the next two meetings.
The next weekly meeting for the networking-bgpvpn project will be on
tuesday, the 5th of january, at 15:00 UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt.
Thanks
Mathieu
__
I am in favor not to go for a least common denominator approach with the
bgpvpn API. The API should cover the use case commonly acknowledged as
useful and which are supported by at least one of the existing back-ends,
with the aim to have various back-ends to grow in support coverage.
So then
Hi all,
I am in favor not to go for a least common denominator approach with the
bgpvpn API. The API should cover the use case commonly acknowledged as
useful and which are supported by at least one of the existing back-ends,
with the aim to have various back-ends to grow in support coverage.
--
*From:* Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:13 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
*Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service
driver
Adding the related subject :)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Mathieu Rohon
mathieu.ro...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:13 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
*Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service
driver
Adding the related subject :)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com
wrote
less.
thanks brandon.
Mathieu
Thanks,
Brandon
--
*From:* Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:13 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
*Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service
driver
Hi all,
The current bgpvpn implementation is using the service type framework, with
a service plugin and one or more service providers.
After registering the bug [1], I wonder if we would rather use a service
plugin per implementation type (bagpipe, ODL, OpenContrail, Nuage...) which
handles API
Adding the related subject :)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
The current bgpvpn implementation is using the service type framework,
with a service plugin and one or more service providers.
After registering the bug [1], I wonder if we
: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:13 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin vs Service driver
Adding the related subject :)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Mathieu Rohon
mathieu.ro...@gmail.commailto:mathieu.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
service plugins, but probably less.
thanks brandon.
Mathieu
Thanks,
Brandon
--
*From:* Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:13 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
*Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] Service Plugin
FYI, the channel is openstack-meeting-3.
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 10:41 PM Mohammad Hanif mha...@brocade.com wrote:
Hi Thomas,
The time reserved for the weekly IRC is 1600 UTC on Tuesdays (
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Neutron_VPNaaS_Meeting). The IRC channel
might not be available on
Hi Paul, all,
Yes, it's good to have a discussion on BGP VPN and edge VPN proposals
during the VPNaaS meeting.
At least Mathieu and I will participate to see how we can help.
To avoid confusion we think it's good to keep separate the discussion on
the details of the work around the
Hi,
We confirm this meeting for tomorrow Tuesday 2nd @15:00 UTC on
#openstack-meeting-alt .
We'll discuss tomorrow what we want to do for future IRC meetings
(day, time, periodicity, etc.).
(Everyone is encouraged to also follow the VPNaaS meeting that will follow)
Best,
-Thomas
Hi Thomas,
The time reserved for the weekly IRC is 1600 UTC on Tuesdays
(http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Neutron_VPNaaS_Meeting). The IRC channel
might not be available on any other time (1500 UTC is taken by the libvirt team
meeting).
Thanks,
—Hanif.
On 5/29/15, 12:57 PM, Vikram
Hi everyone,
As a follow-up to discussions last week on a BGP VPN interconnection API
and the work started with the people already involved, we are going to
hold IRC meetings to discuss how to progress the different pieces of
work, in particular on the API itself [1] and its
You can use the VPNaaS IRC channel/time... we don't have much on the agenda
right now, other than discussion VPN flavors for Liberty, in which it would
be good to discuss BGP VPN and Edge VPN.
Regards,
Paul Michali (pc_m)
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:08 AM thomas.mo...@orange.com wrote:
Hi
Hi Thomos/Mathieu,
Thanks for starting this mail thread. Let's discuss over the IRC as
suggested by Paul.
Thanks
Vikram
On 5/29/15, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:
You can use the VPNaaS IRC channel/time... we don't have much on the agenda
right now, other than discussion VPN flavors for
, October 17, 2014 12:42 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGPVPN implementation discussions
Good news, +1
2014-10-17 0:48 GMT+08:00 Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
as discussed during today's l3
Hi,
1. From where the MPLS traffic will be initiated ?
2. How it will be mapped ?
Regards,
Keshava
From: Damon Wang [mailto:damon.dev...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 12:42 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev
Good news, +1
2014-10-17 0:48 GMT+08:00 Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
as discussed during today's l3-meeting, we keep on working on BGPVPN
service plugin implementation [1].
MPLS encapsulation is now supported in OVS [2], so we would like to
summit a design to leverage OVS
Hi all,
as discussed during today's l3-meeting, we keep on working on BGPVPN
service plugin implementation [1].
MPLS encapsulation is now supported in OVS [2], so we would like to
summit a design to leverage OVS capabilities. A first design proposal,
based on l3agent, can be found here :
21 matches
Mail list logo
