Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-05 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 04/04/2016 23:20, Carl Baldwin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Doug Wiegley > wrote: >> I don’t know, -1 really means, “there is something wrong, the submitter >> should fix it and clear the slate.” Whereas -2 has two meanings. The first >> is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote: > I don’t know, -1 really means, “there is something wrong, the submitter > should fix it and clear the slate.” Whereas -2 has two meanings. The first > is “procedural block”, and the second is “f*** you.” > > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Doug Wiegley
> On Apr 4, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Armando M. wrote: > > > > On 4 April 2016 at 09:22, Ihar Hrachyshka > wrote: > Armando M. > wrote: > > > > On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Darek Smigiel
On 04/04/2016 11:41 AM, Armando M. wrote: On 4 April 2016 at 09:36, Ihar Hrachyshka > wrote: Graham > wrote: On 04/04/2016 17:11, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Darek Smigiel
One of these patchsets was mine, so I feel qualified to send a response :) On 04/04/2016 12:06 PM, Armando M. wrote: On 4 April 2016 at 09:51, Ihar Hrachyshka > wrote: Doug Wiegley

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Armando M.
On 4 April 2016 at 09:51, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Doug Wiegley wrote: > > On Apr 4, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >>> >>> Armando M. wrote: >>> >>> On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar Hrachyshka

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Doug Wiegley wrote: On Apr 4, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Armando M. wrote: On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Armando M.
On 4 April 2016 at 09:36, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Graham wrote: > > On 04/04/2016 17:11, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review >>> queue >>> on every neutron specific gate

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Armando M.
On 4 April 2016 at 09:22, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Armando M. wrote: > > >> >> On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review >> queue on every

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Doug Wiegley
> On Apr 4, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > Armando M. wrote: > >> >> >> On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review queue

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Graham wrote: On 04/04/2016 17:11, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review queue on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly done to make sure that nothing known to be broken land in

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Armando M. wrote: On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review queue on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly done to make sure that

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 04/04/2016 17:11, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review queue > on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly done to > make sure that nothing known to be broken land in merge gate until we fix > the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Armando M.
On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review > queue on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly > done to make sure that nothing known to be broken land in merge

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Anita Kuno
On 04/04/2016 12:01 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review > queue on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly > done to make sure that nothing known to be broken land in merge gate > until we fix the

[openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

2016-04-04 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Hi all, I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review queue on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly done to make sure that nothing known to be broken land in merge gate until we fix the breakage on our side. While I share the goal of not