On 12 June 2015 at 16:58, Henry Gessau wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> > Finally, I received queries from several community members that would be
> keen
> > on helping supporting this microversioning effort. I wonder if the PTL
> and the
> > API lieutenants would ok wit
On 12 June 2015 at 12:22, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 06/11/2015 06:03 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> > As most of you already know, work is beginning to move forward on the
> > micro-versioned Neutron API, for which a specification is available at
> [1]
> >
> > From a practical perspective there is o
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> Finally, I received queries from several community members that would be keen
> on helping supporting this microversioning effort. I wonder if the PTL and the
> API lieutenants would ok with agreeing to have a team of developers meeting
> regularly,
On 06/11/2015 06:03 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> As most of you already know, work is beginning to move forward on the
> micro-versioned Neutron API, for which a specification is available at [1]
>
> From a practical perspective there is one non-negligible preliminary
> issue that needs attentio
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Salvatore Orlando
wrote:
> As most of you already know, work is beginning to move forward on the
> micro-versioned Neutron API, for which a specification is available at [1]
>
>
Yes, I just approved the spec in fact.
> From a practical perspective there is one n
As most of you already know, work is beginning to move forward on the
micro-versioned Neutron API, for which a specification is available at [1]
>From a practical perspective there is one non-negligible preliminary issue
that needs attention. then Neutron API URI prefix includes the full version
n
