Is TOR based vxlan really a common interest to most of the people, and
should a BP be taken care now with its designed use case of 3rd TOR backend
integration?
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Robert Kukura kuk...@noironetworks.com
wrote:
Kyle,
Please consider an FFE for
Kyle,
Please consider an FFE for
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-hierarchical-port-binding.
This was discussed extensively at Wednesday's ML2 meeting, where the
consensus was that it would be valuable to get this into Juno if
possible. The patches have had core reviews
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Robert Kukura kuk...@noironetworks.com wrote:
Kyle,
Please consider an FFE for
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-hierarchical-port-binding.
This was discussed extensively at Wednesday's ML2 meeting, where the
consensus was that it would be
I didn't know that we could ask for FFE, so I'd like to ask (if
yet in time) for:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/agent-child-processes-status
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron+branch:master+topic:bp/agent-child-processes-status,n,z
To get
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
mangel...@redhat.com wrote:
I didn't know that we could ask for FFE, so I'd like to ask (if
yet in time) for:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/agent-child-processes-status
Given how deep the merge queue is (146 currently), we've effectively
reached feature freeze in Neutron now (likely other projects as well).
So this morning I'm going to go through and remove BPs from Juno which
did not make the merge window. I'll also be putting temporary -2s in
the patches to
On 09/03/2014 08:17 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
Given how deep the merge queue is (146 currently), we've effectively
reached feature freeze in Neutron now (likely other projects as well).
So this morning I'm going to go through and remove BPs from Juno which
did not make the merge window. I'll
On Sep 3, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Brian Haley brian.ha...@hp.com wrote:
On 09/03/2014 08:17 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
Given how deep the merge queue is (146 currently), we've effectively
reached feature freeze in Neutron now (likely other projects as well).
So this morning I'm going to go through
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Mark McClain m...@mcclain.xyz wrote:
On Sep 3, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Brian Haley brian.ha...@hp.com wrote:
On 09/03/2014 08:17 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
Given how deep the merge queue is (146 currently), we've effectively
reached feature freeze in Neutron now
