Great! Thanks Anne!
On 22 April 2014 16:44, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Jaume Devesa wrote:
>
>> Another question about this, Kyle:
>>
>> once merged, will there be a place where to read these approved specs, or
>> should we run it locally? I tried to find the a
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Jaume Devesa wrote:
> Another question about this, Kyle:
>
> once merged, will there be a place where to read these approved specs, or
> should we run it locally? I tried to find the approved *nova-specs *in
> docs.openstack.org, but I couldn't find them.
>
>
Hi J
Another question about this, Kyle:
once merged, will there be a place where to read these approved specs, or
should we run it locally? I tried to find the approved *nova-specs *in
docs.openstack.org, but I couldn't find them.
Regards,
jaume
On 21 April 2014 09:02, Mandeep Dhami wrote:
>
> Got
Got it. Thanks.
Regards,
Mandeep
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Mike Scherbakov
wrote:
> That's because spec was proposed to the juno/ folder. Look at
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstack/neutron-specs/master/doc/source/index.rst,
> if spec is in juno/ folder, then contents shows it
That's because spec was proposed to the juno/ folder. Look at
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstack/neutron-specs/master/doc/source/index.rst,
if spec is in juno/ folder, then contents shows it as approved one.
Once merged, it means approved, right? So it is going to be Ok after merge.
Thoug
Yes. It shows up in the approved section since it's just a build of the
patch as-is.
The link is titled gate-neutron-specs-docs in the message from Jenkins.
--
Kevin Benton
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Mandeep Dhami wrote:
> Just for clarification. Jenkins link in the description puts the
Just for clarification. Jenkins link in the description puts the generated
HTML in the section "Juno approved specs" even tho' the blueprint is still
being reviewed. Am I looking at the right link?
Regards,
Mandeep
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Mike Scherbakov
wrote:
> Yes, thanks, that's e
Yes, thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for!
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Mike Scherbakov
> wrote:
> > Hi Kyle,
> > I built template and it looks awesome. We are considering to use same
> > approach for Fuel.
> >
> > My assumpti
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Mike Scherbakov
wrote:
> Hi Kyle,
> I built template and it looks awesome. We are considering to use same
> approach for Fuel.
>
> My assumption is that spec will be on review for a negotiation time, which
> is going to be quite a while. In my opinion, it is not al
Hi Kyle,
I built template and it looks awesome. We are considering to use same
approach for Fuel.
My assumption is that spec will be on review for a negotiation time, which
is going to be quite a while. In my opinion, it is not always very
convenient to read spec in gerrit.
Did you guys have any
Hi folks:
I just wanted to let people know that we've merged a few patches [1]
to the neutron-specs repository over the past week which have updated
the template.rst file. Specifically, Nachi has provided some
instructions for using Sphinx diagram tools in lieu of asciiflow.com.
Either approach is
11 matches
Mail list logo
