On 4 March 2016 at 11:15, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
> On 4 March 2016 at 11:12, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
>> Armando M. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 4 March 2016 at 08:50, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
On 4 March 2016 at 11:12, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Armando M. wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On 4 March 2016 at 08:50, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> currently we have both py27 and py27-constraints tox targets in neutron
>> repos. For
Armando M. wrote:
On 4 March 2016 at 08:50, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Hi all,
currently we have both py27 and py27-constraints tox targets in neutron
repos. For some repos (neutron) they are even executed in both master and
stable/liberty gates. TC
On 4 March 2016 at 08:50, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> currently we have both py27 and py27-constraints tox targets in neutron
> repos. For some repos (neutron) they are even executed in both master and
> stable/liberty gates. TC lately decided that instead of having
Hi all,
currently we have both py27 and py27-constraints tox targets in neutron
repos. For some repos (neutron) they are even executed in both master and
stable/liberty gates. TC lately decided that instead of having separate
targets for constrained requirements, we want to have