Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

Belated but enthusiastic +1 doug > On Dec 15, 2016, at 4:58 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > Hi neutrinos, > > I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for > service-related patches. > > Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1 On 12/16/16, 12:35 PM, "Brandon Logan" wrote: +1! On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 00:58 +0100, Armando M. wrote: > Hi neutrinos, > > I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for > service-related patches. > > Both

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1 On 2016/12/16 8:58, Armando M. wrote: Hi neutrinos, I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for service-related patches. Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1 From: "Armando M." <arma...@gmail.com> Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: Friday, December 16, 2016 at 1:58 AM To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1! On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 00:58 +0100, Armando M. wrote: > Hi neutrinos, > > I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for > service-related patches. > > Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing > and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1 for both of them On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Armando M. wrote: > Hi neutrinos, > > I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for > service-related patches. > > Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and > neutron-fwaas,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1 On 12/15/2016 06:58 PM, Armando M. wrote: Hi neutrinos, I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for service-related patches. Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1 Good work. :) On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Rossella Sblendido wrote: > +1 > > On 12/16/2016 09:25 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > Armando M. wrote: > > > >> Hi neutrinos, > >> > >> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1 On 12/16/2016 09:25 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Armando M. wrote: > >> Hi neutrinos, >> >> I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for >> service-related patches. >> >> Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing >> and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

Armando M. wrote: Hi neutrinos, I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for service-related patches. Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

>>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Sridar >>> >>> From: Kevin Benton <ke...@benton.pub> >>> Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >>> Date: Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 5:00 PM >>> To: OpenStack L

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

st <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >> Date: Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 5:00 PM >> To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate >> Johnston as service LTs >> >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

CI. > > Thanks > > Sridar > > From: Kevin Benton <ke...@benton.pub> > Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 5:00 PM > To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 5:00 PM To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwe

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1 From: Kevin Benton [mailto:ke...@benton.pub] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 5:00 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service L

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1 On Dec 15, 2016 19:03, "Armando M." wrote: > Hi neutrinos, > > I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for > service-related patches. > > Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and > neutron-fwaas, and have a good

[openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

Hi neutrinos, I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for service-related patches. Both are core in their repos of focus, namely neutron-dynamic-routing and neutron-fwaas, and have a good understanding of the service framework, the agent framework and other bits and pieces.