On 8/20/2015 10:42 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 8/20/2015 5:33 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 20 August 2015 at 03:08, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
After spending a few hours on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1370590
I'm annoyed by the fact we don't yet have a CI
I've started an etherpad to track the work needed to get an lxc job going in
nova's experimental queue:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-lxc-ci
--
Thanks...we would really appreciate the LXC testing.
this is great to see. While there is a lot of discussions around containers,
an
On 20 August 2015 at 03:08, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
After spending a few hours on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1370590
I'm annoyed by the fact we don't yet have a CI system for testing libvirt +
LXC.
Bit thank you for raising this one.
At the Juno midcycle in
On 8/20/2015 5:33 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 20 August 2015 at 03:08, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
After spending a few hours on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1370590
I'm annoyed by the fact we don't yet have a CI system for testing libvirt +
LXC.
Bit thank you
After spending a few hours on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1370590 I'm annoyed by the fact we
don't yet have a CI system for testing libvirt + LXC.
At the Juno midcycle in Portland I thought I remember some guy(s) from
Rackspace talking about getting a CI job running, whatever
