Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [api] Nova currently handles list with limit=0 quite different for different objects.

2015-09-23 Thread Zhenyu Zheng
Hi, Alex, Thanks for the information, I was unable to join the conference yesterday. Then lets get the dicision done before fix it. BR, Zheng On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Alex Xu wrote: > Hi, Zhengyu, > > We discussed this in yesterday Nova API meeting. We think it

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [api] Nova currently handles list with limit=0 quite different for different objects.

2015-09-22 Thread Zhenyu Zheng
Any thoughts on this? On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > Hi, Thanks for your reply, after check again and I agree with you. I think > we should come up with a conclusion about how we should treat this limit=0 > across nova. And that's also why I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [api] Nova currently handles list with limit=0 quite different for different objects.

2015-09-22 Thread Alex Xu
Hi, Zhengyu, We discussed this in yesterday Nova API meeting. We think it should get consistent in API-WG. And there already have patch for pagination guideline https://review.openstack.org/190743 , and there also have some discussion on limits. So we are

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [api] Nova currently handles list with limit=0 quite different for different objects.

2015-09-13 Thread Zhenyu Zheng
Hi, Thanks for your reply, after check again and I agree with you. I think we should come up with a conclusion about how we should treat this limit=0 across nova. And that's also why I sent out this mail. I will register this topic in the API meeting open discussion section, my be a BP in M to fix

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [api] Nova currently handles list with limit=0 quite different for different objects.

2015-09-11 Thread Kevin L. Mitchell
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 15:41 +0800, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > Hi, I found out that nova currently handles list with limit=0 quite > different for different objects. > > Especially when list servers: > > According to the code: >