Matt, i'll take a stab at it
thanks,
dims
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
>
>
> On 12/30/2013 7:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>
>> Excerpts from Day, Phil's message of 2013-12-30 11:05:17 -0800:
>>>
>>> Hi, so it seems we were saying the same thing - new vms get a shared
>>>
On 12/30/2013 7:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Day, Phil's message of 2013-12-30 11:05:17 -0800:
Hi, so it seems we were saying the same thing - new vms get a shared "blank"
(empty) file system, not blank disc. How big a problem it is that in many cases this
will be the already cr
As a follow-up, I've filed this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1266262
We'll be working around this in TripleO by setting
default_ephemeral_format for our baremetal clouds, but I feel we should
document in Icehouse's release notes that the default will be changed
to ext4 in Juno, so th
Change to revert the default to ext3: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64666/
> -Original Message-
> From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com]
> Sent: 31 December 2013 01:31
> To: openstack-dev
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert change of default ephemer
Excerpts from Day, Phil's message of 2013-12-30 11:05:17 -0800:
> Hi, so it seems we were saying the same thing - new vms get a shared "blank"
> (empty) file system, not blank disc. How big a problem it is that in many
> cases this will be the already created ext3 disk and not ext4 depends I gu
ves the ephemeral backing files
though at the moment.
Phil
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
From: Pádraig Brady
Date:
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
,"Day, Phil"
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert
ng List (not for usage questions); Day, Phil
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert change of default ephemeral fs
> to ext4
>
...
> To be most general and avoid this consistency issue, I suppose we could
> change the name format for these cached CoW base images
On 12/30/2013 12:39 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 12/29/2013 08:12 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> As highlighted in the thread “minimal review period for functional changes”
>> I’d like to propose that change is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63209/
>> is reverted because:
>>
>> -
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
From: Pádraig Brady
Date:
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Cc: "Day, Phil"
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert change of default ephemeral fs to
ext4
&g
On 12/29/2013 08:12 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> As highlighted in the thread “minimal review period for functional changes”
> I’d like to propose that change is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63209/ is
> reverted because:
>
>
>
> - It causes inconsistent behaviour
Hi Folks,
As highlighted in the thread "minimal review period for functional changes" I'd
like to propose that change is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63209/ is
reverted because:
- It causes inconsistent behaviour in the system, as any existing
"default" backing files will have ex
11 matches
Mail list logo
