On 12/30/2013 7:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Day, Phil's message of 2013-12-30 11:05:17 -0800:
Hi, so it seems we were saying the same thing - new vms get a shared blank
(empty) file system, not blank disc. How big a problem it is that in many cases this
will be the already
Matt, i'll take a stab at it
thanks,
dims
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 12/30/2013 7:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Day, Phil's message of 2013-12-30 11:05:17 -0800:
Hi, so it seems we were saying the same thing - new vms get
As a follow-up, I've filed this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1266262
We'll be working around this in TripleO by setting
default_ephemeral_format for our baremetal clouds, but I feel we should
document in Icehouse's release notes that the default will be changed
to ext4 in Juno, so
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
From: Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com
Date:
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Day, Phil philip@hp.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert change
On 12/30/2013 12:39 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/29/2013 08:12 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
Hi Folks,
As highlighted in the thread “minimal review period for functional changes”
I’d like to propose that change is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63209/
is reverted because:
- It causes
(not for usage questions); Day, Phil
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert change of default ephemeral fs
to ext4
...
To be most general and avoid this consistency issue, I suppose we could
change the name format for these cached CoW base images from
ephemeral_10_default, ephemeral_20_linux
] [nova] - Revert change of default ephemeral fs to
ext4
On 12/30/2013 12:39 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/29/2013 08:12 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
Hi Folks,
As highlighted in the thread “minimal review period for functional changes”
I’d like to propose that change is https://review.openstack.org
Excerpts from Day, Phil's message of 2013-12-30 11:05:17 -0800:
Hi, so it seems we were saying the same thing - new vms get a shared blank
(empty) file system, not blank disc. How big a problem it is that in many
cases this will be the already created ext3 disk and not ext4 depends I guess
Hi Folks,
As highlighted in the thread minimal review period for functional changes I'd
like to propose that change is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63209/ is
reverted because:
- It causes inconsistent behaviour in the system, as any existing
default backing files will have ext3
