Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do any hyperviors allow disk
reduction
as part of resize ?
On 18 June 2014 21:57, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/17/2014 05:42 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:32:36PM +0100
-Original Message-
From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
Sent: 23 June 2014 10:35
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do any hyperviors allow disk reduction
as part of resize ?
On 18 June 2014 21:57, Jay
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:55:41AM +, Day, Phil wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
Sent: 23 June 2014 10:35
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do any hyperviors allow
: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do any hyperviors allow disk reduction
as part of resize ?
On 18 June 2014 21:57, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/17/2014 05:42 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:32:36PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 06/13/2014 02:22 PM, Day, Phil wrote:
I
On 18 June 2014 21:57, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/17/2014 05:42 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:32:36PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 06/13/2014 02:22 PM, Day, Phil wrote:
I guess the question I’m really asking here is: “Since we know resize
down
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 17 June 2014 15:57
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do any hyperviors allow disk reduction
as part of resize ?
On 06/17/2014 10:43 AM
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:05:01AM +, Day, Phil wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 17 June 2014 15:57
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do any hyperviors allow
-Original Message-
From: Richard W.M. Jones [mailto:rjo...@redhat.com]
Sent: 18 June 2014 12:32
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do any hyperviors allow disk reduction
as part of resize ?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014
On 06/17/2014 05:42 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:32:36PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 06/13/2014 02:22 PM, Day, Phil wrote:
I guess the question I’m really asking here is: “Since we know resize down
won’t work in all cases,
and the failure if it does occur will
So I am +1 deprecating resize down, mostly for consistency reasons.
On 16 June 2014 10:34, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
Beyond what is and isn’t technically possible at the file system level there
is always the problem that the user may have more data than can fit into the
reduced disk.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 06:12:16AM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Theoretically impossible to reduce disk unless you have some really nasty
guest additions.
True for live resizing.
For dead resizing, libguestfs + virt-resize can do it. Although I
wouldn't necessarily recommend it. In almost
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:56:36AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 06/17/2014 10:43 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 06:12:16AM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Theoretically impossible to reduce disk unless you have some really nasty
guest additions.
True for live
On 06/17/2014 10:43 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 06:12:16AM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Theoretically impossible to reduce disk unless you have some really nasty
guest additions.
True for live resizing.
For dead resizing, libguestfs + virt-resize can do it.
On 06/13/2014 02:22 PM, Day, Phil wrote:
I guess the question I’m really asking here is: “Since we know resize down
won’t work in all cases,
and the failure if it does occur will be hard for the user to detect,
should we just block it at the API layer and be consistent across all
This is a fix in flight for the vmware driver. It also throws an exception on
disk size reduction.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85804/
On Jun 13, 2014, at 3:02 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
I was looking at the resize code in libvirt, and it has checks which
Hi Folks,
I was looking at the resize code in libvirt, and it has checks which raise an
exception if the target root or ephemeral disks are smaller than the current
ones - which seems fair enough I guess (you can't drop arbitary disk content on
resize), except that the because the check is in
Theoretically impossible to reduce disk unless you have some really nasty
guest additions.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
I was looking at the resize code in libvirt, and it has checks which raise
an exception if the target root or ephemeral
inconsistent error checking across
drivers.
From: Aryeh Friedman [mailto:aryeh.fried...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 June 2014 11:12
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do any hyperviors allow disk reduction as
part of resize ?
Theoretically
probably going to end up being not resizing disks down.
*From:*Aryeh Friedman [mailto:aryeh.fried...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 13 June 2014 11:12
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do any hyperviors allow disk
reduction as part of resize
...@rackspace.com]
Sent: 13 June 2014 13:57
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do any hyperviors allow disk reduction as
part of resize ?
On 06/13/2014 08:03 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
Theoretically impossible to reduce disk unless you have
On 06/13/2014 09:22 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
I guess the question I’m really asking here is: “Since we know resize
down won’t work in all cases, and the failure if it does occur will be
hard for the user to detect, should we just block it at the API layer
and be consistent across all Hypervisors
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/13/2014 09:22 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
I guess the question I’m really asking here is: “Since we know resize
down won’t work in all cases, and the failure if it does occur will be
hard for the user to detect, should we just
, June 13, 2014 at 4:22 PM
To: OpenStack List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do any hyperviors allow disk reduction as
part of resize ?
I guess the question I'm really asking here is: Since we know resize down
won't work
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 06/13/2014 10:53 AM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/13/2014 09:22 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
I guess the question I’m really asking here is: “Since we know resize
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:24:04AM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 06/13/2014 10:53 AM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/13/2014 09:22 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
On 06/13/14 16:37, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The xenapi implementation only works on ext[234] filesystems. That rules
out *BSD, Windows and Linux distributions that don't use ext[234]. RHEL7
defaults to XFS for instance.
Presumably it'll have a hard time if the guest uses LVM for its image
or
Also ZFS needs to know what is on the guest for example bhyve (the only
working hv for bsd currency [vbox kind of also works]) stores the backing
store (unless bare metal) as single block file. It is impossible to make
that non-opaque to the outside world unless you can run commands on the
27 matches
Mail list logo
