On Mon, Nov 23 2015, Jordan Pittier wrote:
> Is the DB the limiting factor of openstack performance ? De we have hard
> evidence of this ? We need numbers before acting otherwise it will be an
> endless discussion.
>
> When I look at the number of race conditions we had/have in OpenStack, it
>
Matt Riedemann said on Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:58:55PM -0600:
> On 11/20/2015 10:19 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
> >Should we drive one way or the other, or just put up with mixed-mode?
> For the record, I hate the mixed mode.
+1
> >What should be the policy for new relations?
> I prefer consistency,
Julien Danjou said on Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 05:52:59PM +0100:
> On Fri, Nov 20 2015, Alexis Lee wrote:
> > We just had a fun discussion in IRC about whether foreign keys are evil.
> > Initially I thought this was crazy but mordred made some good points. To
> > paraphrase, that if you have a
Hi,
However, data
> integrity /can/ be preserved in other ways than RDBMS constraints, while
> persistence layer performance caps that of the whole system
Is the DB the limiting factor of openstack performance ? De we have hard
evidence of this ? We need numbers before acting otherwise it will
Jordan Pittier said on Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:59:35AM +0100:
> Is the DB the limiting factor of openstack performance ? De we have hard
> evidence of this ? We need numbers before acting otherwise it will be an
> endless discussion.
Properly parallelised workers scale linearly. Persistent
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2015-11-22 11:59:06 -0800:
>
> On 11/20/2015 04:33 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2015-11-20 11:29:31 -0800:
> >>
> >> On 11/20/2015 11:19 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
> >>> We just had a fun discussion in IRC about whether foreign
On 11/20/2015 04:33 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2015-11-20 11:29:31 -0800:
>>
>> On 11/20/2015 11:19 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
>>> We just had a fun discussion in IRC about whether foreign keys are evil.
>>> Initially I thought this was crazy but mordred made some
We just had a fun discussion in IRC about whether foreign keys are evil.
Initially I thought this was crazy but mordred made some good points. To
paraphrase, that if you have a scale-out app already it's easier to
manage integrity in your app than scale-out your persistence layer.
Currently the
On Fri, Nov 20 2015, Alexis Lee wrote:
> We just had a fun discussion in IRC about whether foreign keys are evil.
> Initially I thought this was crazy but mordred made some good points. To
> paraphrase, that if you have a scale-out app already it's easier to
> manage integrity in your app than
On 11/20/2015 10:19 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
We just had a fun discussion in IRC about whether foreign keys are evil.
Initially I thought this was crazy but mordred made some good points. To
paraphrase, that if you have a scale-out app already it's easier to
manage integrity in your app than
On 11/20/2015 11:19 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
> We just had a fun discussion in IRC about whether foreign keys are evil.
> Initially I thought this was crazy but mordred made some good points. To
> paraphrase, that if you have a scale-out app already it's easier to
> manage integrity in your app
On 11/20/2015 02:29 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
>
> On 11/20/2015 11:19 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
>> We just had a fun discussion in IRC about whether foreign keys are evil.
>> Initially I thought this was crazy but mordred made some good points. To
>> paraphrase, that if you have a scale-out app
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2015-11-20 11:29:31 -0800:
>
> On 11/20/2015 11:19 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
> > We just had a fun discussion in IRC about whether foreign keys are evil.
> > Initially I thought this was crazy but mordred made some good points. To
> > paraphrase, that if you have
Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2015-11-20 10:58:55 -0800:
>
> On 11/20/2015 10:19 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
> > We just had a fun discussion in IRC about whether foreign keys are evil.
> > Initially I thought this was crazy but mordred made some good points. To
> > paraphrase, that if you
14 matches
Mail list logo
