Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

2016-03-29 Thread Moshe Levi
> -Original Message- > From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 10:20 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a > regression, why? > > On 0

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

2016-03-28 Thread Moshe Levi
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 3:35 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) d...@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] The same SRIOV / NFV

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

2016-03-25 Thread Jay Pipes
On 03/24/2016 09:35 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: We have another mitaka-rc-potential bug [1] due to a regression when detaching SR-IOV interfaces in the libvirt driver. There were two NFV CIs that ran on the original change [2]. Both failed with the same devstack setup error [3][4]. So it sucks

[openstack-dev] [nova] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

2016-03-24 Thread Matt Riedemann
We have another mitaka-rc-potential bug [1] due to a regression when detaching SR-IOV interfaces in the libvirt driver. There were two NFV CIs that ran on the original change [2]. Both failed with the same devstack setup error [3][4]. So it sucks that we have a regression, it sucks that no