On 3/16/2015 8:48 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
Hi Mike,
The points was, there is no real need or real use case for archiving the db
as the nova-mange does.
What is the exact use case ? Auditing ? Accounting ?
* Keystone allows permanent delete, if you need to do auditing probably
the user
Hi Mike,
The points was, there is no real need or real use case for archiving the db
as the nova-mange does.
What is the exact use case ? Auditing ? Accounting ?
* Keystone allows permanent delete, if you need to do auditing probably
the user accounts would the primary target for saving.
*
On 03/12/2015 05:29 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
snip
If we assume that all of our tables are filled up with zeroes for those
deleted columns, because that’s the default, this **wipes the whole table
clean**.
How do the tests pass? Well the tests are in test_db_api-ArchiveTestCase,
and actually,
[snip]
If we assume that all of our tables are filled up with zeroes for those
deleted columns, because that’s the default, this **wipes the whole table
clean**.
How do the tests pass? Well the tests are in test_db_api-ArchiveTestCase,
and actually, they don’t. But they don’t fail every
The archiving has issues since very long time [1],
something like this [2] is expected to replace it.
The archiving just move trash to the other side of the desk,
usually just permanently deleting everything what is deleted
for more than 7 day is better for everyone.
For now, maybe just wiping
On 03/13/2015 07:07 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/13/2015 05:54 AM, Thomas Herve wrote:
[snip]
If we assume that all of our tables are filled up with zeroes for those
deleted columns, because that’s the default, this **wipes the whole table
clean**.
How do the tests pass? Well the tests are
On 03/13/2015 05:54 AM, Thomas Herve wrote:
[snip]
If we assume that all of our tables are filled up with zeroes for those
deleted columns, because that’s the default, this **wipes the whole table
clean**.
How do the tests pass? Well the tests are in test_db_api-ArchiveTestCase,
and
On 03/13/2015 07:57 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/13/2015 07:07 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/13/2015 05:54 AM, Thomas Herve wrote:
[snip]
If we assume that all of our tables are filled up with zeroes for those
deleted columns, because that’s the default, this **wipes the whole table
clean**.
Attila Fazekas afaze...@redhat.com wrote:
The archiving has issues since very long time [1],
something like this [2] is expected to replace it.
yeah I was thinking of just rewriting the archive routine in Nova to be
reasonable, but I can build this routine into Oslo.db as well as a generic
Hello Nova -
Not sure if I’m just staring at this for too long, or if
archive_deleted_rows_for_table() is just not something we ever use.
Because it looks like it’s really, really broken very disastrously, and I’m
wondering if I’m just missing something in front of me.
Let’s look at what it
10 matches
Mail list logo
