Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] security_groups extension in nova api v3

2013-08-13 Thread Melanie Witt
On Aug 13, 2013, at 2:11 AM, Day, Phil wrote: > If we really want to get clean separation between Nova and Neutron in the V3 > API should we consider making the Nov aV3 API only accept lists o port ids in > the server create command ? > > That way there would be no need to every pass security g

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] security_groups extension in nova api v3

2013-08-13 Thread Day, Phil
st > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] security_groups extension in nova api v3 > > Hi All, > > I did the initial port of the security_groups api extension to v3 and have > been > testing it out in devstack while adding the expected_errors decorator to it. > > The guidance so far

[openstack-dev] [nova] security_groups extension in nova api v3

2013-08-09 Thread Melanie Witt
Hi All, I did the initial port of the security_groups api extension to v3 and have been testing it out in devstack while adding the expected_errors decorator to it. The guidance so far on network-related extensions in v3 is not to duplicate actions that can be accomplished through the neutron a