Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 09/05/2015 07:57 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova-docker] Status update
John,
Good questions. Remarks in-line from the Magnum perspective.
On May 9, 2015, at 2:51 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com
Has there been any decision made on if and when the nova-docker driver will
move back to the Nova tree and out of Stackforge?
-Steve Adams
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
Adam,
Please follow the discussion on the nova-spec review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/128753/
At the moment, we need folks actively watching the project in terms of
reviews, gate/check job failures, keeping up with Nova trunk etc.
Please let me know if you or anyone else is interested.
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 17/05/2015 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova-docker] Status update
Good questions Matt and Alex. Currently Magnum creates Bays (places
that can run containers, or pods
List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 09/05/2015 07:57 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova-docker] Status update
John,
Good questions. Remarks in-line from the Magnum perspective.
On May 9, 2015, at 2:51 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 09/05/2015 07:57 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova-docker] Status update
John,
Good questions. Remarks in-line from the Magnum perspective.
On May 9, 2015, at 2:51 AM
(not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 09/05/2015 07:57 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova-docker] Status update
John,
Good questions. Remarks in-line from the Magnum perspective.
On May 9, 2015, at 2:51 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 04:55:47PM +, Adrian Otto wrote:
I will also mention that it’s natural to be allergic to the idea of
nested virtualization. We all know that creating multiple levels of
hardware virtualization leads to bad performance outcomes.
This seems to paint an overly bleak
On 9 May 2015 at 17:55, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
On the subject of extending the Nova API to accommodate special use cases of
containers that are beyond the scope of the Nova API, I think we should
resist that, and focus those container-specific efforts in Magnum.
+1
The
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 02:57:08PM +0100, John Garbutt wrote:
On 9 May 2015 at 17:55, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote:
On the subject of extending the Nova API to accommodate special use cases
of containers that are beyond the scope of the Nova API, I think we should
resist
Just as a reminder, not only libvirt-lxc can be used as an os-like
container provider but
also recently added libvirt-parallels driver. And regarding nested
Docker support, we
have just implemented it thus, anyone will be able to use nested
application Docker
containers via libvirt-parallels
+1 Agreed nested containers are a thing. Its a great reason to keep
our LXC driver.
I don't think that's a reason we should keep our LXC driver, because you
can still run containers in containers with other things. If anything,
using a nova vm-like container to run application-like containers
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
+1 Agreed nested containers are a thing. Its a great reason to keep
our LXC driver.
I don't think that's a reason we should keep our LXC driver, because you
can still run containers in containers with other things. If
On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 16:55 +, Adrian Otto wrote:
I will also mention that it’s natural to be allergic to the idea of
nested virtualization. We all know that creating multiple levels of
hardware virtualization leads to bad performance outcomes. However,
nested containers do not carry that
On 1 May 2015 at 16:14, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone still interested in this work? :)
* there's a stable/kilo branch now (see
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/nova-docker/).
* CI jobs are running fine against both nova trunk and nova's
stable/kilo branch.
*
John,
Good questions. Remarks in-line from the Magnum perspective.
On May 9, 2015, at 2:51 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 1 May 2015 at 16:14, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone still interested in this work? :)
* there's a stable/kilo branch now (see
Anyone still interested in this work? :)
* there's a stable/kilo branch now (see
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/nova-docker/).
* CI jobs are running fine against both nova trunk and nova's
stable/kilo branch.
* there's an updated nova-spec to get code back into nova tree (see
17 matches
Mail list logo
