On 12/09/2013 05:18 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 11:11 -0600, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-09 10:55, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/09/2013 11:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On
On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800:
On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
Hello, Sean.
I get the issue with upgrade path. User doesn't want to update
config unless one is
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800:
On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
Hello, Sean.
I get the
On 12/09/2013 11:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800:
On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday
On 2013-12-09 10:55, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/09/2013 11:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 11:11 -0600, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-09 10:55, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/09/2013 11:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800:
On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
So it still seems that we are at an impasse here on getting new olso
lockutils into cinder because it doesn't come with a working default.
As a recap - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48935/ (that sync)
is blocked by failing upgrade testing, because lock_path has no default,
so it has to land
Hello, Sean.
I get the issue with upgrade path. User doesn't want to update config
unless one is forced to do so.
But introducing code that weakens security and let it stay is an
unconditionally bad idea.
It looks like we have to weigh two evils: having troubles upgrading and
lessening security.
On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
Hello, Sean.
I get the issue with upgrade path. User doesn't want to update config unless
one is forced to do so.
But introducing code that weakens security and let it stay is an
unconditionally bad idea.
It looks like we have to weigh
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800:
On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
Hello, Sean.
I get the issue with upgrade path. User doesn't want to update config
unless one is forced to do so.
But introducing code that weakens security and let it
On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800:
On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
Hello, Sean.
I get the issue with upgrade path. User doesn't want to update config unless
one is forced to do so.
But introducing code that
11 matches
Mail list logo
