[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] meeting cancelled

Hi everyone, Due to most of us being at the OpenStack Summit, we're cancelling the meeting tomorrow. Thanks everyone and see you in Berlin. Regards, Mohammed -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost - D. 514-316-8872 D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200 E.

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping xenial jobs

FYI: Thanks to Jesse, he has picked up this work and it's up here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/609329/6 On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 9:56 AM Jesse Pretorius wrote: > > On 10/10/18, 5:54 AM, "Mohammed Naser" wrote: > > >So I’ve been thinking of dropping the Xenial jobs to reduce our overall

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping xenial jobs

On 10/10/18, 5:54 AM, "Mohammed Naser" wrote: >So I’ve been thinking of dropping the Xenial jobs to reduce our overall > impact in terms of gate usage in master because we don’t support it. I think we can start dropping it given our intended supported platform for Stein is Bionic, not

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping xenial jobs

On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 06:50 +0200, Mohammed Naser wrote: > Hi everyone! > > So I’ve been thinking of dropping the Xenial jobs to reduce our > overall impact in terms of gate usage in master because we don’t > support it. > > However, I was a bit torn on this because i realize that it’s >

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping xenial jobs

Hi everyone! So I’ve been thinking of dropping the Xenial jobs to reduce our overall impact in terms of gate usage in master because we don’t support it. However, I was a bit torn on this because i realize that it’s possible for us to write things and backport them only to find out that

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] blocked gates

Hi everyone: Our gates have unfortunately been blocked because of OpenSUSE failures and Bionic timeouts, I have submitted a patch to set both to non voting Bionic: It seems to take a really long time for APT installs, I'm investigating and thanks to fungi I hope to have an instance to get it up

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

On 11.9.2018 18:53, Alex Schultz wrote: Thanks everyone for coming and chatting. From the meeting we've had a few items where we can collaborate together. Here are some specific bullet points: - TripleO folks should feel free to propose some minor structural changes if they make the

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

Thanks everyone for coming and chatting. From the meeting we've had a few items where we can collaborate together. Here are some specific bullet points: - TripleO folks should feel free to propose some minor structural changes if they make the integration easier. TripleO is currently

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

I just realized I booked the room and put it in the etherpad but forgot to email out the time. Time: Tuesday 09:00-10:45 Room: Big Thompson https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ansible-collaboration-denver-ptg Thanks, -Alex On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] ptg schedule

Hi team: I've come up with a schedule which includes the general events happening at the PTG which would be interesting for the OSA team and contributors. https://calendar.google.com/calendar?cid=dmV4eGhvc3QuY29tXzgwNmJyb2hpZnNoaGdmY2kzcWdqdDk3aTJzQGdyb3VwLmNhbGVuZGFyLmdvb2dsZS5jb20 Please let

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] no meeting this week

Hi team: We won't be conducting a meeting this week because of the PTG, however, we'll be making an effort to try and allow/bring remote access to those not at the PTG over this week. Thanks everyone. Regards, Mohammed __

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

Hi Andy: I made a metal note of replying to this but I never got a chance to :( It was great working with you, you're always welcome back anytime! :) Thanks, Mohammed On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 3:32 AM Hugh Saunders wrote: > > Thanks for all your hard work on OSA Andy :) > > On Thu, 30 Aug 2018

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Mohammed Naser wrote: > Hi Alex, > > I am very much in favour of what you're bringing up. We do have > multiple projects that leverage Ansible in different ways and we all > end up doing the same thing at the end. The duplication of work is > not really

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

Thanks for all your hard work on OSA Andy :) On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 18:41 Andy McCrae wrote: > Now that Rocky is all but ready it seems like a good time! Since changing > roles I've not been able to keep up enough focus on reviews and other > obligations - so I think it's time to step aside as

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

> From: Andy McCrae > Now that Rocky is all but ready it seems like a good time! Since changing > roles I've not been able to keep up enough focus on reviews and other > obligations - so I think it's time to step aside as a core reviewer. > I want to say thanks to everybody in the community,

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

Hey Andy, I can only underline what Ian says. It was a pleasure to work with you, many thanks for your kind support all the time. Keep your ears stiff, what we say in Germany. And good luck :) kind regards Frank Am 2018-08-30 20:05, schrieb Ian Y. Choi: Hello Andy, Thanks a lot for your

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

On 30/08/18 18:40, Andy McCrae wrote: > Now that Rocky is all but ready it seems like a good time! Since > changing roles I've not been able to keep up enough focus on reviews and > other obligations - so I think it's time to step aside as a core reviewer. > > I want to say thanks to everybody in

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

Andy, We’ll miss you! Thanks so much for all your hard work and leadership. Don’t be a stranger! Amy (spotz) Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 30, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Ian Y. Choi wrote: > > Hello Andy, > > Thanks a lot for your work on OpenStack-Ansible team. > > It was very happy to

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

Thanks for all you do and have done for the OpenStack Community, Andy :) Andy McCrae wrote: Now that Rocky is all but ready it seems like a good time! Since changing roles I've not been able to keep up enough focus on reviews and other obligations - so I think it's time to step aside as a core

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

Hello Andy, Thanks a lot for your work on OpenStack-Ansible team. It was very happy to collaborate with you as different teams (me: I18n team) during Ocata and Pike release cycles, and I think I18n team now has better insight on OpenStack-Ansible thanks to the help from you and so many kind

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

Now that Rocky is all but ready it seems like a good time! Since changing roles I've not been able to keep up enough focus on reviews and other obligations - so I think it's time to step aside as a core reviewer. I want to say thanks to everybody in the community, I'm really proud to see the work

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][ptg] PTG etherpad planning.

Dear community, We are approaching the PTG in Denver, and I want to remind everybody to make sure you are ready for it! I've created the etherpad [1] where you can add any topic you want to discuss, if you haven't done so already. If you are not able to attend the PTG, please mention it on

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

Hi, On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:00 AM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:33 PM Alex Schultz wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Doug Hellmann >> wrote: >> > Excerpts from Alex Schultz's message of 2018-08-09 14:31:34 -0600: >> >> Ahoy folks, >> >> >> >> I think it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

> On 8/10/18, 3:20 AM, "Paul Belanger" wrote: > >This is basically what I do with roles i write, allow the user to decide > to step >over specific tasks. For example, I have created nodepool_task_manager > variable >with the following: > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

A couple of changes [1][2] that I proposed to kolla ansible recently as a PoC could be related here. Kolla ansible is full of almost identical roles for each service, with a lot of duplicated 'code' (YAML). The idea was to try to factor some of that out into shared roles. This results in less code

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

Hello, On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:47 AM Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:00:13PM -0600, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:33 PM Alex Schultz wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Doug Hellmann > > > wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Alex Schultz's

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:00:13PM -0600, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:33 PM Alex Schultz wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Doug Hellmann > > wrote: > > > Excerpts from Alex Schultz's message of 2018-08-09 14:31:34 -0600: > > >> Ahoy folks, > > >> > > >> I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:33 PM Alex Schultz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Doug Hellmann > wrote: > > Excerpts from Alex Schultz's message of 2018-08-09 14:31:34 -0600: > >> Ahoy folks, > >> > >> I think it's time we come up with some basic rules/patterns on where > >> code lands when

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Alex Schultz's message of 2018-08-09 14:31:34 -0600: >> Ahoy folks, >> >> I think it's time we come up with some basic rules/patterns on where >> code lands when it comes to OpenStack related Ansible roles and as we >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

Excerpts from Alex Schultz's message of 2018-08-09 14:31:34 -0600: > Ahoy folks, > > I think it's time we come up with some basic rules/patterns on where > code lands when it comes to OpenStack related Ansible roles and as we > convert/export things. There was a recent proposal to create an >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

Hi Alex, I am very much in favour of what you're bringing up. We do have multiple projects that leverage Ansible in different ways and we all end up doing the same thing at the end. The duplication of work is not really beneficial for us as it takes away from our use-cases. I believe that

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

Ahoy folks, I think it's time we come up with some basic rules/patterns on where code lands when it comes to OpenStack related Ansible roles and as we convert/export things. There was a recent proposal to create an ansible-role-tempest[0] that would take what we use in

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Jonathan Rosser as core reviewer

+1 From: Markos Chandras Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 4:35:55 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Jonathan Rosser as core reviewer On 07/30/2018 11:16 AM, jean-phili...@evrard.me wrote: > He

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Jonathan Rosser as core reviewer

On 07/30/2018 11:16 AM, jean-phili...@evrard.me wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'd like to propose Jonathan Rosser (jrosser) as core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. > The BBC team [1] has been very active recently across the board, but worked > heavily in our ops repo, making sure the

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Change in our IRC channel

Maybe such change should be considered to be done globally on all OpenStack channels? > Wiadomość napisana przez jean-phili...@evrard.me w dniu 01.08.2018, o godz. > 10:13: > > Hello everyone, > > Due to a continuously increasing spam [0] on our IRC channels, I have decided > to make our

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Change in our IRC channel

Hello everyone, Due to a continuously increasing spam [0] on our IRC channels, I have decided to make our channel (#openstack-ansible on freenode) only joinable by Freenode's nickserv registered users. I am sorry for the inconvenience, as it will now be harder to reach us (but it's not that

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Jonathan Rosser as core reviewer

+1 nice guy to be a core! On Mon, Jul 30, 2018, 13:08 Mohammed Naser wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Jesse Pretorius > wrote: > >>On 7/30/18, 9:19 AM, "jean-phili...@evrard.me" > wrote: > >> > >>I'd like to propose Jonathan Rosser (jrosser) as core reviewer for >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Jonathan Rosser as core reviewer

On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: >>On 7/30/18, 9:19 AM, "jean-phili...@evrard.me" >>wrote: >> >>I'd like to propose Jonathan Rosser (jrosser) as core reviewer for >> OpenStack-Ansible. >>The BBC team [1] has been very active recently across the board, but >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Jonathan Rosser as core reviewer

>On 7/30/18, 9:19 AM, "jean-phili...@evrard.me" wrote: > >I'd like to propose Jonathan Rosser (jrosser) as core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. >The BBC team [1] has been very active recently across the board, but > worked heavily in our ops repo, making sure the experience is

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Jonathan Rosser as core reviewer

+2 from me! Amy (spotz) On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 3:16 AM, jean-phili...@evrard.me < jean-phili...@evrard.me> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'd like to propose Jonathan Rosser (jrosser) as core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. > The BBC team [1] has been very active recently across the board, but

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Jonathan Rosser as core reviewer

Hello everyone, I'd like to propose Jonathan Rosser (jrosser) as core reviewer for OpenStack-Ansible. The BBC team [1] has been very active recently across the board, but worked heavily in our ops repo, making sure the experience is complete for operators. I value Jonathan's opinion (I

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Using jmespath more

Hello, According to the readability test here [1], contributors prefer reading a task like the following: - name: Fail if service was deployed using a different installation method fail: msg: "Switching installation methods for OpenStack services is not supported" when: -

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] PTL non-candidacy

Hello everyone, If you were not at the previous OpenStack-Ansible meeting*, I'd like to inform you I will not be running for PTL of OSA. It's been a pleasure being the PTL of OSA for the last 2 cycles. We have improved in many ways: testing, stability, speed, features, documentation, user

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping selinux support

This title seems very scary. It was to be read as "... for source installs" : ) To be honest, I feel very sad about the lack of involvement in CentOS in OSA over the years. We didn't get many contributors over time for it. This has always been a labour of love, and the honeymoon seems over for

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping selinux support

Hi Paul: On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:56:22PM -0400, Mohammed Naser wrote: >> Hi everyone: >> >> This email is to ask if there is anyone out there opposed to removing >> SELinux bits from OpenStack ansible, it's blocking some of the gates >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping selinux support

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:56:22PM -0400, Mohammed Naser wrote: > Hi everyone: > > This email is to ask if there is anyone out there opposed to removing > SELinux bits from OpenStack ansible, it's blocking some of the gates > and the maintainers for them are no longer working on the project >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping selinux support

Also, this is the change that drops it, so feel free to vote with your opinion there too: https://review.openstack.org/578887 Drop SELinux support from os_swift On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Mohammed Naser wrote: > Hi everyone: > > This email is to ask if there is anyone out there opposed

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping selinux support

Hi everyone: This email is to ask if there is anyone out there opposed to removing SELinux bits from OpenStack ansible, it's blocking some of the gates and the maintainers for them are no longer working on the project unfortunately. I'd like to propose removing any SELinux stuff from OSA based

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Restarting our very own "SIG" teams

Hello, TL:DR; If you have spare cycles, join one of our interest groups! In the Queens cycle, I have formalised the "liaisons" work, making them an integral part of the Thursday's meeting agenda. Sadly, that initiative didn't work, as almost no liaison worked/reported on those meetings, and I

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][releases][governance] Change in OSA roles tagging

Hello, *TL:DR;* If you are an openstack-ansible user, consuming our roles directly, with tags, without using openstack-ansible plays or integrated repo, then things will change for you. Start using git shas instead of tags. All other openstack-ansible users should not see a difference, even if

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

On 03/05/18 09:13, Andy McCrae wrote: > > > I will gladly pick up my well-used meeting chair hat. > It's a great idea, I think it would help make our meetings more productive. > Once you've been chair you have a different view of how the meetings work. > > Andy I too think this is a great idea

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

I think Jesse sumarized things elegantly. Here is an analogy for you, to complement the answer with more background. Let me compare our state with a new company, as this is a a notion people many people can relate to. Initially we were a startup. Only a few people were working on OSA on its

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling * So my question is... what is the health status of OSA? Is there still a core of committed contributors? I only c

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

Hi OSA peeps. I apologise in advance for what may seem like an impertinent question. And for those playing along at home, I was just getting the hang of contributing to OSA when last year my employer decided that some of us were no longer needed, and OpenStack lost quite a few full time employed

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

> > > Now that we are all part-time, I'd like to toy with a new idea, > proposed in the past by Jesse, to rotate the duties with people who > are involved in OSA, or want to get involved more (it's not restricted > to core developers!). > > One of the first duties to be handled this way could be

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

Also +1.__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

Excerpts from Jean-Philippe Evrard's message of 2018-05-02 17:14:07 +0200: > Hello everyone, > > Now that we are all part-time, I'd like to toy with a new idea, > proposed in the past by Jesse, to rotate the duties with people who > are involved in OSA, or want to get involved more (it's not

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

+1 good idea On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Amy Marrich wrote: > +1, leading meetings is a great way to get folks involved in the Community > and gives them some 'ownership' within the project. > > Amy (spotz) > > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard < >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

+1, leading meetings is a great way to get folks involved in the Community and gives them some 'ownership' within the project. Amy (spotz) On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard < jean-phili...@evrard.me> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Now that we are all part-time, I'd like to toy

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

I am definitely +1 on this, I think it's a great idea. Thanks, Dave Wilde (d34dh0r53) On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:27 AM Mohammed Naser wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard > wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Now that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Now that we are all part-time, I'd like to toy with a new idea, > proposed in the past by Jesse, to rotate the duties with people who > are involved in OSA, or want to get involved more

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

Hello everyone, Now that we are all part-time, I'd like to toy with a new idea, proposed in the past by Jesse, to rotate the duties with people who are involved in OSA, or want to get involved more (it's not restricted to core developers!). One of the first duties to be handled this way could be

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Mohammed Naser as core reviewer

+2! On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Carter, Kevin wrote: > +2 from me! > > > -- > > Kevin Carter > IRC: Cloudnull > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:06 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> >> On 24/04/18 16:05, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Mohammed Naser as core reviewer

+2 from me! -- Kevin Carter IRC: Cloudnull On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:06 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 24/04/18 16:05, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I’d like to propose Mohammed Naser [1] as a core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. > > > > +2 > > --

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Mohammed Naser as core reviewer

On 24/04/18 16:05, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I’d like to propose Mohammed Naser [1] as a core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. > +2 -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Mohammed Naser as core reviewer

On 4/24/18, 4:08 PM, "Jean-Philippe Evrard" wrote: >I’d like to propose Mohammed Naser [1] as a core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. A happy +2 from me. ( Rackspace Limited is a company registered in England & Wales (company

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Mohammed Naser as core reviewer

+2 from me. Marc Gariépy On 2018-04-24 11:05 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: Hi everyone, I’d like to propose Mohammed Naser [1] as a core reviewer for OpenStack-Ansible. He has been working actively on fixing the telemetry stack, and is now willing to step up to improve the CentOS platform

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Mohammed Naser as core reviewer

+2 from me! Amy (spotz) On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard < jean-phili...@evrard.me> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I’d like to propose Mohammed Naser [1] as a core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. > > He has been working actively on fixing the telemetry stack, and is now >

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Mohammed Naser as core reviewer

Hi everyone, I’d like to propose Mohammed Naser [1] as a core reviewer for OpenStack-Ansible. He has been working actively on fixing the telemetry stack, and is now willing to step up to improve the CentOS platform which is now in a very degraded state. I feel that it’s important that he’s able

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Problems with Openstack services while migrating VMs

Maybe worth posting on operators, but it looks like the scheduling of the action fails, which let me think that nova is not running fine somewhere. Why is the restart in a random order? That can cause issues, and that's the whole reason why we are orchestrating the deploys/upgrade with ansible.

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Problems with Openstack services while migrating VMs

Hi, I'm trying to migrate controller and compute VMs installed with Openstack-Ansible across systems with following approach. This is mainly to minimize the deployment time in the Jenkins CI environment. Export steps: 1. Power off the VMs gracefully. 2. virsh dumpxml ${node} >

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] We need to change!

Dear community, Starting at the end of this month, I won't be able to work full time on OpenStack-Ansible anymore. I want to highlight the following: Our current way of working is not sustainable in the long run, as a lot of work (and therefore pressure) is concentrated on a few individuals. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

Hello, Ahah, gate job breakages? You were the first to break them, but also willing to step in to fix them as soon as you knew. And that's the part I will remember the most. You will be missed, Major. Your next team is lucky to have you! It was a pleasure working with you. And the gifs, omagad!

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

Ah Major, we shall definitely miss your readiness to help, positive attitude and deep care for setenforce 1. Oh, and then there're the gifs... so many gifs... While I am inclined to [1], I shall instead wish you well while you [2]. ( [1] https://media.giphy.com/media/1BXa2alBjrCXC/giphy.gif

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

All the best Major, thanks for all your work on OSA :) On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 at 14:05 Major Hayden wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hey there, > > As promised, I am stepping down from being an OpenStack-Ansible core > reviewer since I am unable to

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hey there, As promised, I am stepping down from being an OpenStack-Ansible core reviewer since I am unable to meet the obligations of the role with my new job. :( Thanks to everyone who has mentored me along the way and put up with my gate job

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] Vancouver forum etherpad

Dear OpenStack-Ansiblers, We've got an etherpad here [1], to track all the things we want to discuss at the forum. if you're an OpenStack-Ansible user, don't hesitate to add your session ideas, list what you liked or disliked in the last release, and share your experience! Thank you in advance.

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Ansible Disk requirements [docs] [osa]

Right, that's a little absurd, 1TB? :-) , I completely agree. They could live with anything, but I'd try to estimate minimums across distributions for example, an RDO test deployment with containers looks like: (undercloud) [stack@undercloud ~]$ ssh heat-admin@192.168.24.8 "sudo df -h ; sudo

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Ansible Disk requirements [docs] [osa]

Hello, That's what it always was, but it was hidden in the pages. Now that I refactored the pages to be more visible, you spotted it :) Congratulations! More seriously, I'd like to remove that requirement, showing people can do whatever they like. It all depends on how/where they store images,

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Ansible Disk requirements [docs] [osa]

Compute host disk requirements for Openstack Ansible seem high in the documentation. I think I have used smaller compute hosts in the past. Did something change in Queens? https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/latest/overview-requirements.html Compute hosts Disk

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Meetings change (PTG discussion follow-up)

Hello, We discussed the problem of the miscommunication at the PTG, and we agreed the focus of the week solved many things for clarity. I am not sure we need to send a ML summary, if all is recorded in the meeting each week: people can just browse meetings for this info. I have no strong opinion

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Meetings change (PTG discussion follow-up)

JP, When the Community meeting was moved to once a month there was a lot of resulting miscommunication as a result. If a weekly review is going to be sent to the mailing list with channel discussions is going to be sent out, I think that's a good alternative but the conversations still need to

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Meetings change (PTG discussion follow-up)

Hello, During the PTG, we've discussed about changing our meetings. I'd like to have a written evidence in our mailing lists, showing what we discussed, and what we proposed to change. I propose we validate those changes if they get no opposition in the next 7 days (deadline: 13 March). What we

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Roles not passing functional tests

Dear community, We are everyday closer to the end of the cycle, and the following roles seem not ready for integration into the next release, because they are failing their own gates's functional testing for more than two weeks: - os_ceilometer - os_aodh - os_trove - os_magnum Following the

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][ptl] PTL candidacy for Rocky

Hello everyone, I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the OpenStack-Ansible project for the Rocky cycle. I will focus on a single theme this cycle, simplification. After all the features introduced in Queens cycle, it's time to simplify our work: * Reduce the amount of variables in

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Limiting pip wheel builds for OpenStack clients

I added my comment/opinion on the bug. Thanks for reporting this, Major! __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Limiting pip wheel builds for OpenStack clients

estions) > > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Limiting pip wheel builds > > for OpenStack clients > > > > Hey there, > > > > I was spelunking into the slow wheel build problems we've been seeing > > in Cent

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Limiting pip wheel builds for OpenStack clients

> -Original Message- > From: Major Hayden [mailto:ma...@mhtx.net] > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 8:03 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] L

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Limiting pip wheel builds for OpenStack clients

Hey there, I was spelunking into the slow wheel build problems we've been seeing in CentOS and I found that our wheel build process was spending 4-6 minutes building cassandra-driver. The wheel build process usually takes 8-12 minutes, so half the time is being spent there. More digging

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] problems with bringing up openstack in AIO flavor with OVS

Hello, On 04/01/18 10:29, Periyasamy Palanisamy wrote: > Hi OSA Experts, > >   > > I’m trying to bring up openstack using openstack-ansible in AIO flavor > by having neutron ml2 plugin set to ovs. > > OSA is being executed from OPNFV XCI deployer with attached > openstack_user_config and

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] problems with bringing up openstack in AIO flavor with OVS

Hi OSA Experts, I'm trying to bring up openstack using openstack-ansible in AIO flavor by having neutron ml2 plugin set to ovs. OSA is being executed from OPNFV XCI deployer with attached openstack_user_config and user_variables*.yml files. I can see installation [1] is being successful, but

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Cannot connect to proxy server from infra1-repo-container

Hi, We are trying test environment deployment with OpenStack-ansible pike release. After executing setup-hosts.yaml, the lxc-containers were created. We have an issue while doing *apt-get update *in infra-repo-container as it couldn't connect to the proxy server. The strange thing is that the

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Cannot connect to prxy server from infra1-repo-container

Hi, We are trying test environment deployment with openstack-ansible pike release. After executing setup-hosts.yaml, the lxc-containers were created. We have an issue while doing apt-get update in infra-repo-container as it couldn't connect to the proxy server. The strange this is that the

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Sydney summit -- We'll be there!

Hello everyone, A small delegation of our openstack-ansible team will be in Sydney, and we are looking forward to meeting all of you! We'll have an ops feedback session during the forum happening on Monday 6th, 1:30 pm - 2:10 pm. If you're willing to get started with openstack-ansible,

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Role maturity downgrades: Looking for contributions/maintainers

Hello everyone, With our role maturity guidelines now in place [1], we can now start the maturity downgrade procedure [2] for the following roles: - monasca [3] - monasca-agent [4] - octavia [5] - searchlight [6] On top of that, the os_freezer role need more love [7], while still in incubated

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Looking for help: bug triage meeting organiser

Hello everyone, I'd be very happy if someone can take over the bug triage czar duty, and report it in our community meeting end of each month. It doesn't take too much time in itself (preparing a list of bugs before the meeting, having an opinion on them, and attend the bug triage meeting). IMO,

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Changes in meetings now in application!

Hello everyone, From this week on, openstack-ansible will meet in the #openstack-ansible channel, every Tuesday, 16:00 UTC. No meeting will happen on Thursdays anymore. The community meeting would happen the last Tuesday of the month, the bug triages are kept the rest of the time. Keep also in

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Meetings change

Hello everyone, Some people on this planet are more aware of others of this fact: we have too many meetings in our life. I don't think OpenStack-Ansible should be so greedy to take 8 hours of your life a month for meetings. I therefore propose the reduction to 4 meetings/month: 3 bug triages and

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-Ansible testing with OpenVSwitch

I use openstack-ansible for all of my OpenStack testing and deployment needs currently so if there was an AIO that I could use as a reference that would be awesome. I personally found that having scenarios available in the AIO helps drive upgrades and adoptions of new features. As an example I

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-Ansible testing with OpenVSwitch

Well, there are ppl already running OpenVSwitch on openstack-ansible, so I guess it's just a question of a few bug fixes and adding a scenario to make sure this is working forever :p On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Gyorgy Szombathelyi wrote: > >> >> Hello

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >