Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2015-12-17 10:59:03 -0500:
> Thierry,
>
> Right, i believe it was on IRC and not a ML thread. Since there is no
> urgency on this one, we can wait till Doug gets back to revisit the
> decision.
When we started removing more modules from the
Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 12/13/2015 10:33 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>> On 14 December 2015 at 15:28, Matt Riedemann
>> wrote:
>>> I don't have a pressing need to backport something right now, but as
>>> long as
>>> there was code in oslo-incubator that *could* be
Thierry,
Right, i believe it was on IRC and not a ML thread. Since there is no
urgency on this one, we can wait till Doug gets back to revisit the
decision.
Thanks,
Dims
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> On 12/13/2015 10:33
On 12/13/2015 10:33 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 14 December 2015 at 15:28, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I don't have a pressing need to backport something right now, but as long as
there was code in oslo-incubator that *could* be synced to other projects
which wasn't
On 12/11/2015 10:24 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Matt,
Do you have an example? This was a deliberate decision to leave it out.
-- Dims
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
oslo-incubator is EOL now but it's missing a stable/liberty branch, and
On 14 December 2015 at 15:28, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
>
> I don't have a pressing need to backport something right now, but as long as
> there was code in oslo-incubator that *could* be synced to other projects
> which wasn't in libraries, then that code could have
oslo-incubator is EOL now but it's missing a stable/liberty branch, and
we need one for backporting changes that will be synced to projects in
liberty. I'm not sure what commit would be used to create the
stable/liberty branch though.
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
Matt,
Do you have an example? This was a deliberate decision to leave it out.
-- Dims
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
> oslo-incubator is EOL now but it's missing a stable/liberty branch, and we
> need one for backporting changes that will be