On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 08:14:03AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/21/2013 05:19 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>
> >>
> >>Definitely agree we should have plenty of end-to-end tests in the
> >>gate, it's the reason we've got the scenario tests, to do exactly
> >>this kind of through testing.
> >
> >Ok,
On 10/21/2013 05:19 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
Definitely agree we should have plenty of end-to-end tests in the
gate, it's the reason we've got the scenario tests, to do exactly
this kind of through testing.
Ok, it seems like a potential solution which may keep all involved happy
would be:
- Ad
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 07:45:33AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/19/2013 04:46 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:48:08PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> >>So v3 keystone API is one thing, but I'm a little concerned with
> >>moving the client testing to Tempest haphazardly. If we
On 10/19/2013 04:46 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:48:08PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
So v3 keystone API is one thing, but I'm a little concerned with
moving the client testing to Tempest haphazardly. If we are testing
the API surface on the servers, the clients should be able
On 10/18/2013 09:10 PM, Adam Young wrote:
On 10/18/2013 07:21 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/18/2013 05:09 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM, David Stanek mailto:dsta...@dstanek.com>> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sean Dague mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:48:08PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> So v3 keystone API is one thing, but I'm a little concerned with
> moving the client testing to Tempest haphazardly. If we are testing
> the API surface on the servers, the clients should be able to
> correctly test all of this via a mo
On 10/18/2013 07:21 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/18/2013 05:09 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM, David Stanek mailto:dsta...@dstanek.com>> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sean Dague mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote:
On 10/18/2013 12:04 PM, Brant Knudso
On 10/18/2013 05:09 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM, David Stanek mailto:dsta...@dstanek.com>> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sean Dague mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote:
On 10/18/2013 12:04 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
2) "git clone"ing th
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM, David Stanek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
>
>> On 10/18/2013 12:04 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 2) "git clone"ing the keystoneclient doesn't work well with parallel
>>> testing (we have a similar problem in our tests with o
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 12:04 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
>
>>
>> 2) "git clone"ing the keystoneclient doesn't work well with parallel
>> testing (we have a similar problem in our tests with our "pristine"
>> database backup)
>>
>
> Can you go into the spec
On 10/18/2013 01:54 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/18/2013 11:59 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Steven Hardy mailto:sha...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
Starting a thread to discuss $subject, as requested in:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51558/
Fir
On 10/18/2013 01:54 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/18/2013 11:59 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Steven Hardy mailto:sha...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
Starting a thread to discuss $subject, as requested in:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51558/
Fir
On 10/18/2013 11:59 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Steven Hardy mailto:sha...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
Starting a thread to discuss $subject, as requested in:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51558/
First a bit of background. I wrote a keystone
On 10/18/2013 12:04 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
To provide a bit more background... Keystone has a bunch of
keystoneclient tests for the v2 API. These tests actually "git clone"
a version of keystoneclient (master, essex-3, and 0.1.1)[0], to use
for testing. Maybe at some point the tests were jus
On 10/18/2013 12:04 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
To provide a bit more background... Keystone has a bunch of
keystoneclient tests for the v2 API. These tests actually "git clone" a
version of keystoneclient (master, essex-3, and 0.1.1)[0], to use for
testing. Maybe at some point the tests were just
Thanks, Steve. I suggested a new directory because we really need to
have more complete tests of the client libs since they are not tied to
particular OpenStack releases and we claim the current libs should work
with older releases. That said, I did not realize the intent was to do
more than te
To provide a bit more background... Keystone has a bunch of keystoneclient
tests for the v2 API. These tests actually "git clone" a version of
keystoneclient (master, essex-3, and 0.1.1)[0], to use for testing. Maybe
at some point the tests were just for client-server compatibility, but now
they'r
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Starting a thread to discuss $subject, as requested in:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51558/
>
> First a bit of background. I wrote a keystoneclient patch, and ayoung
> stated he'd like it tested via tempest before he'd a
Hi all,
Starting a thread to discuss $subject, as requested in:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51558/
First a bit of background. I wrote a keystoneclient patch, and ayoung
stated he'd like it tested via tempest before he'd ack it:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48462/
So I spoke to ayoung
19 matches
Mail list logo
