Responses inline.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 12/09/2013 10:12 AM, Brant Knudson wrote:
Monty -
Thanks for doing the work already to get the infrastructure set up.
Looks like I've got the easy part here. I posted an initial patch that
has one
On 2013-12-09 11:07:50 -0600 (-0600), Brant Knudson wrote:
[...]
Is testing multiple versions of keystoneclient actually worth it?
If the other projects don't feel the need for this then why does
Keystone? It's actually caught problems so it's proved useful to
Keystone, and we're making
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2013-12-09 11:07:50 -0600 (-0600), Brant Knudson wrote:
[...]
Is testing multiple versions of keystoneclient actually worth it?
If the other projects don't feel the need for this then why does
Keystone? It's
On 2013-12-09 11:50:31 -0600 (-0600), Brant Knudson wrote:
[...]
I don't know of any specific testing that verifies that the
client works against older (stable/*) servers. Maybe it happens
when you submit a change to stable/ later.
When a change is submitted or approved for a stable/foo server
On 12/09/2013 11:07 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/09/2013 10:12 AM, Brant Knudson wrote:
Monty -
Thanks for doing the work already to get the infrastructure set up.
Looks like I've got the easy part here. I posted an initial patch that
has one test from keystone in
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Hi!
Thanks - I've been wanting to kill this for a long time. Thanks for
starting the discussion...
On 12/08/2013 07:26 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
We'd like to get the keystoneclient tests out of keystone. They're
Monty -
Thanks for doing the work already to get the infrastructure set up. Looks
like I've got the easy part here. I posted an initial patch that has one
test from keystone in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60724/ . I hope to
be able to move all the tests over unchanged. The tricky part is
On 12/09/2013 10:12 AM, Brant Knudson wrote:
Monty -
Thanks for doing the work already to get the infrastructure set up.
Looks like I've got the easy part here. I posted an initial patch that
has one test from keystone in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60724/ .
I hope to be able to move
We'd like to get the keystoneclient tests out of keystone. They're serving
a useful purpose of catching problems with non-backwards compatible changes
in keystoneclient so we still want them run. Problem is they're running at
the wrong time -- only on changes to keystone and not changes to
On Sunday, December 08, 2013 11:26:07 AM, Brant Knudson wrote:
We'd like to get the keystoneclient tests out of keystone. They're
serving a useful purpose of catching problems with non-backwards
compatible changes in keystoneclient so we still want them run.
Problem is they're running at the
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
On Sunday, December 08, 2013 11:26:07 AM, Brant Knudson wrote:
We'd like to get the keystoneclient tests out of keystone. They're
serving a useful purpose of catching problems with non-backwards
compatible
Hi!
Thanks - I've been wanting to kill this for a long time. Thanks for
starting the discussion...
On 12/08/2013 07:26 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
We'd like to get the keystoneclient tests out of keystone. They're
serving a useful purpose of catching problems with non-backwards
compatible
12 matches
Mail list logo
