On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 08:17:50 +0200
Valeriy Ponomaryov wrote:
> I disagree to moving this logic to "tempest/services/*". The idea of
> these modules - assemble requests and return responses. Testing and
> verification should be wrapped over it. Either base class or tests,
> it depends on situation
ck Development Mailing List
> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest] Where to do response body
> > validation
> >
> > The new tempest body response validation is being added to
> > individual testcases. See this as an example:
> >
> > https://review.opensta
Hi Chris,
Thank you for picking it up,
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:56 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest] Where to do response body validati
I disagree to moving this logic to "tempest/services/*". The idea of these
modules - assemble requests and return responses. Testing and verification
should be wrapped over it. Either base class or tests, it depends on
situation...
--
Kind Regards
Valeriy Ponomaryov
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:55
Hi,
The new tempest body response validation is being added to individual
testcases. See this as an example:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78149
After having a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80174/
I'm now thinking that perhaps we should be doing the response validation
in the temp
