Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] moratorium on new negative tests in Tempest

2013-11-22 Thread Daisuke Morita
Great work! Now the test cases in Tempest are well-stocked so it's a good time to rearrange the design of test codes. I checked mailing lists, IRC log and etherpads relating to this topic. Let me leave my 5 thoughts below. How to handle: 1. Data type (e.g, int, bool) 2. Specific value or

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] moratorium on new negative tests in Tempest

2013-11-13 Thread Koderer, Marc
in Tempest -Original Message- From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 4:33 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] moratorium on new negative tests in Tempest So that is the starting point. Comments

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] moratorium on new negative tests in Tempest

2013-11-12 Thread Monty Taylor
On 11/12/2013 02:33 PM, David Kranz wrote: On 11/12/2013 01:36 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-11-12 10:01:06 -0800: During the freeze phase of Havana we got a ton of new contributors coming on board to Tempest, which was super cool. However it meant we had

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] moratorium on new negative tests in Tempest

2013-11-12 Thread Rochelle.Grober
- From: pcrews [mailto:glee...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 2:03 PM To: Monty Taylor; openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] moratorium on new negative tests in Tempest On 11/12/2013 12:20 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 11/12/2013 02:33 PM, David Kranz wrote