Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] trimming down Tempest smoke tag

2015-05-01 Thread Robert Collins
On 1 May 2015 at 05:39, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 04/30/2015 12:53 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: snip Yeah why would you not include admin tests? Like listing services and hosts in nova? It is extremely easy to say why not include *, it's valid function and we're going to end up with

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] trimming down Tempest smoke tag

2015-04-30 Thread Sean Dague
On 04/30/2015 12:53 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: snip Yeah why would you not include admin tests? Like listing services and hosts in nova? It is extremely easy to say why not include *, it's valid function and we're going to end up with an hour long smoke test. At some point, you have to cut.

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] trimming down Tempest smoke tag

2015-04-30 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/28/2015 4:19 PM, David Kranz wrote: On 04/28/2015 06:38 AM, Sean Dague wrote: The Tempest Smoke tag was originally introduced to provide a quick view of your OpenStack environment to ensure that a few basic things were working. It was intended to be fast. However, during Icehouse the

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] trimming down Tempest smoke tag

2015-04-28 Thread David Kranz
On 04/28/2015 06:38 AM, Sean Dague wrote: The Tempest Smoke tag was originally introduced to provide a quick view of your OpenStack environment to ensure that a few basic things were working. It was intended to be fast. However, during Icehouse the smoke tag was repurposed as a way to let

[openstack-dev] [qa] trimming down Tempest smoke tag

2015-04-28 Thread Sean Dague
The Tempest Smoke tag was originally introduced to provide a quick view of your OpenStack environment to ensure that a few basic things were working. It was intended to be fast. However, during Icehouse the smoke tag was repurposed as a way to let neutron not backslide (so it's massively