Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release] FFE for constraints update for python-tackerclient bug-fix release

2018-02-08 Thread Thierry Carrez
Matthew Thode wrote: > It should have time to get in for the freeze, the question I have is > 'What in openstack is broken if we update upper-contraints after the > freeze instead of before?' > A follow up question is 'does this need a global-requirements.txt bump?' In other words, will the new

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release] FFE for constraints update for python-tackerclient bug-fix release

2018-02-07 Thread Matthew Thode
On 18-02-07 23:01:25, Yongsheng Gong wrote: > Hi, > > The tacker client has na initial queens release which does not have right > reno notes. Recently I have added some reno patches. > And also the team wants a feature to land in the queens release. > > I have requested the newer release at >

[openstack-dev] [requirements][release] FFE for constraints update for python-tackerclient bug-fix release

2018-02-07 Thread Yongsheng Gong
Hi, The tacker client has na initial queens release which does not have right reno notes. Recently I have added some reno patches. And also the team wants a feature to land in the queens release. I have requested the newer release at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541638/