[openstack-dev] [security] Security SIG Meeting Time Change

2018-03-05 Thread Luke Hinds
Hi All, As agreed during the PTG, we will switch Thursdays meetings from 17:00 UTC, to 15:00 UTC. -- Luke __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] Security SIG

2017-11-23 Thread Luke Hinds
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-11-03 07:49:05 + (+), Luke Hinds wrote: > [...] > > One thing came to mind on Jeremy's points around the VMT, is > > OSSN's > > > > We often get a workflow where Sec-Core are brought into a private > > LP

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] Security SIG

2017-11-18 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-11-03 07:49:05 + (+), Luke Hinds wrote: [...] > One thing came to mind on Jeremy's points around the VMT, is > OSSN's > > We often get a workflow where Sec-Core are brought into a private > LP bug to determine if its suitable for an OSSN, and it remains so > until we release the

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] Security SIG

2017-11-04 Thread Thierry Carrez
Luke Hinds wrote: > [...] > Something else which comes to mind; it seems to me we are more of a > 'working group', are working groups no longer a thing in OpenStack? - > SIG seems like a better fit for topics focused mainly on cross project > collaborations efforts (API's being a good example),

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] Security SIG

2017-11-03 Thread Luke Hinds
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Luke Hinds wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Stanley > > wrote: > > > >> On 2017-10-27 15:30:34 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: > >>> [...] > >>> I

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] Security SIG

2017-10-30 Thread Thierry Carrez
Luke Hinds wrote: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Stanley > wrote: > >> On 2017-10-27 15:30:34 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> [...] >>> I think the Security project team would benefit from becoming a >>> proper SIG. >>> [...] >> I

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] Security SIG

2017-10-27 Thread Luke Hinds
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-10-27 15:30:34 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: > [...] > > I think the Security project team would benefit from becoming a > > proper SIG. > [...] > > I tend to agree, though it's worth also considering what

[openstack-dev] [security] Security SIG

2017-10-27 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, Once upon a time we only had one governance construct to recognize activity in OpenStack, and that was the upstream project teams. As a result, we created teams for everything. However with the introduction of SIGs, we have a new construct for activities that are not mainly about