-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
I have posted this series and it has evoked a surprising (to me) amount
of discussion so I wanted to clarify some things and talk to some of the
issues so we can move forward.
So first note is this is an early posting and still is not tested
Angus/Julien,
I would disagree that we should expose the mistral DSL to end users.
What if we decide to use something other than Mistral in the future? We should
be able to plug in any workflow system we want without changing what we expose
to the end user.
To me, the pipeline DSL is similar
)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] reviews for the new API
Hi Angus,
I really agree with you. I would insist on #3, most of our users will use the
default workbook, and only advanced users will want to customize the workflow.
advanced users should easily understand a mistral workbook, cause
Murali,
I’d like to explore the possibility that Solum users don’t need to see a
pipeline DSL at all in the general case, and that only power users are
interacting with it. If that UX is possible, then what DSL is used is much less
important as long as it allows customizations to at least the
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] reviews for the new API
Angus/Julien,
I would disagree that we should expose the mistral DSL to end users.
What if we decide to use something other than Mistral in the future? We should
be able to plug in any workflow system we want without changing
List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] reviews for the new API
Angus/Julien,
I would disagree that we should expose the mistral DSL to end users.
What if we decide to use something other than Mistral in the future? We
should be able to plug in any workflow
] [solum] reviews for the new API
Angus/Julien,
I would disagree that we should expose the mistral DSL to end users.
What if we decide to use something other than Mistral in the future? We should
be able to plug in any workflow system we want without changing what we expose
to the end user.
To me
Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] reviews for the new API
Angus/Julien,
I would disagree that we should expose the mistral DSL to end users.
What if we decide to use something other than Mistral in the future? We
should be able to plug
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: Randall Burt
Date:06/04/2014 12:35 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] reviews for the new API
Sorry to poke my head
...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 2:58 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] reviews for the new API
Good question Randall.
Either we implement some workflow, which is what we do now that is not
configurable, or we adopt
10 matches
Mail list logo
