Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Hey Jesse, Sorry for the delay. I've gone ahead and removed icehouse, juno and kilo branches creating tags in their places. Cheers, Josh On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Jesse Pretorius < jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote: > From: Joshua Hesketh > > > I assume

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

From: Joshua Hesketh > I assume you want to wait for the tag to merge before removing the branch? The only tag job I can see for openstack-ansible* projects is the releasenotes one. This should be harmless as it just generates the notes

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Jesse Pretorius < jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that OpenStack-Ansible has the final Swift kilo-eol tag implemented > we’ve requested a final tag [1]. Once that merges we are ready to have our > kilo-eol tag implemented and the ‘kilo’

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Now that OpenStack-Ansible has the final Swift kilo-eol tag implemented we’ve requested a final tag [1]. Once that merges we are ready to have our kilo-eol tag implemented and the ‘kilo’ branch removed. Whoops – I forget to add the link to the final Kilo tag request. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Hi all, Now that OpenStack-Ansible has the final Swift kilo-eol tag implemented we’ve requested a final tag [1]. Once that merges we are ready to have our kilo-eol tag implemented and the ‘kilo’ branch removed. Just to make life interesting, we still have leftover ‘juno’ and ‘icehouse’

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > Removing the pbr branch should be fine - it was an exceptional thing > to have that branch in the first place - pbr is consumed by releases > only, and due to its place in the dependency graph is very very very

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > Hi, I had earlier requested in this thread that the stable/kilo branch > for the following repos be not deleted: > > > openstack/group-based-policy > > openstack/group-based-policy-automation > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > Hi, I had earlier requested in this thread that the stable/kilo branch > for the following repos be not deleted: > > > openstack/group-based-policy > > openstack/group-based-policy-automation > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Removing the pbr branch should be fine - it was an exceptional thing to have that branch in the first place - pbr is consumed by releases only, and due to its place in the dependency graph is very very very hard to pin or cap. -Rob On 25 June 2016 at 12:37, Tony Breeds

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 04:36:03PM -0700, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > Hi Tony, Thanks for your response, and no worries! We can live with > the kilo-eol tag, no need to try to delete it. And as you suggested, > we can add a second eol tag when we actually EoL this branch. > > As regards reviving the

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Hi Tony, Thanks for your response, and no worries! We can live with the kilo-eol tag, no need to try to delete it. And as you suggested, we can add a second eol tag when we actually EoL this branch. As regards reviving the deleted branches, would a bug have to be created somewhere to track this,

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:20:12AM -0700, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > Hi, I had earlier requested in this thread that the stable/kilo branch > for the following repos be not deleted: > > > openstack/group-based-policy > > openstack/group-based-policy-automation > > openstack/group-based-policy-ui >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Hi, I had earlier requested in this thread that the stable/kilo branch for the following repos be not deleted: > openstack/group-based-policy > openstack/group-based-policy-automation > openstack/group-based-policy-ui > openstack/python-group-based-policy-client and the request was ack’ed by

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On 06/24/2016 02:09 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: Hi all, I have completed removing stable/kilo branches from the projects listed [0]*. There are now 'kilo-eol' tags in place at the sha's where the branches were. *There are a couple of exceptions. oslo-incubator was listed but is an unmaintained

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Hi all, I have completed removing stable/kilo branches from the projects listed [0]*. There are now 'kilo-eol' tags in place at the sha's where the branches were. *There are a couple of exceptions. oslo-incubator was listed but is an unmaintained project so no further action was required. Tony

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On 6/2/16 4:31 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Any projects that will be EOL'd will need all open reviews abandoned before it > can be processed. openstack/vmware-nsx kilo patches have been abandoned in preparation for the EOL. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:16:10AM -0700, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > Hi Tony, The following repos should not be included in the EoL list since > they will not be EoL'ed at this time: > openstack/group-based-policy > openstack/group-based-policy-automation > openstack/group-based-policy-ui >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > >> On 10 Jun 2016, at 00:03, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >>> On 09 Jun 2016, at 11:16, Sumit Naiksatam

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

> On 10 Jun 2016, at 00:03, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> >>> On 09 Jun 2016, at 11:16, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: >>> >>> Hi Tony, The following repos should not be

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > >> On 09 Jun 2016, at 11:16, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: >> >> Hi Tony, The following repos should not be included in the EoL list since >> they will not be EoL'ed at this time: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

> On 09 Jun 2016, at 11:16, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > > Hi Tony, The following repos should not be included in the EoL list since > they will not be EoL'ed at this time: > openstack/group-based-policy > openstack/group-based-policy-automation

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Hi Tony, The following repos should not be included in the EoL list since they will not be EoL'ed at this time: openstack/group-based-policy openstack/group-based-policy-automation openstack/group-based-policy-ui openstack/python-group-based-policy-client Thanks, Sumit. On Jun 9, 2016 12:16 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 04:25:01PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 08:31:43PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > > Hi all, > > In early May we tagged/EOL'd several (13) projects. We'd like to do a > > final round for a more complete set. We looked for projects meet one or > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Regarding openstack/murano-apps, in this repo we use stable/kilo branch not as a version of the apps, but rather than compatibility version of the app. Applications which are published in this branch are compatible with Murano from stable/kilo, given than we have a lag between upstream release and

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

I’ve submitted a request to release all the unreleased code we still have for murano repositories https://review.openstack.org/#/c/325359/ ; It would be really great if we could get one final release before EOL’ing kilo in murano, murano-dashboard, murano-agent and python-muranoclient, if that is

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:05:36PM +0200, Alan Pevec wrote: > > openstack/packstack BigTent > > Just to clarify, Packstack has not formally applied to BigTent yet, it > has only been automatically migrated from stackforge to openstack > namespace. Okay

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:10:23PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> I think that all openstack/puppet-* projects that have stable/kilo can >> be kilo-EOLed. >> Let me know if it's ok and I'll abandon all open reviews.

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

> openstack/packstack BigTent Just to clarify, Packstack has not formally applied to BigTent yet, it has only been automatically migrated from stackforge to openstack namespace. But yes, please keep its kilo branch for now until we properly wrap it up.

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:29:34AM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote: > On 02/06/16 12:31, Tony Breeds wrote: > > The list of 171 projects that match above is at [1]. There are > > another 68 > I just abandoned open reviews for django_openstack_auth in kilo version. Thanks. Yours Tony.

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/06/16 12:31, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, In early May we tagged/EOL'd several (13) projects. We'd > like to do a final round for a more complete set. We looked for > projects meet one or more of the following criteria: - The project > is

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 08:31:43PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, > In early May we tagged/EOL'd several (13) projects. We'd like to do a > final round for a more complete set. We looked for projects meet one or more > of the following criteria: > - The project is

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 08:41:40AM -0700, John Dickinson wrote: > open swift/swiftclient patches to stable/kilo have been abandoned Thanks John Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:10:23PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > I think that all openstack/puppet-* projects that have stable/kilo can > be kilo-EOLed. > Let me know if it's ok and I'll abandon all open reviews. Totally fine with me. I've added them. Feel free to abanond the reviews. Any

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > I think all networking-* repos should EOL too, since they are plugins to > neutron which is already EOL. I struggle to find a way that could maintain > their gate without neutron. Thanks I've added them. Yours Tony.

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, > In early May we tagged/EOL'd several (13) projects. We'd like to do a > final round for a more complete set. We looked for projects meet one or more > of the following criteria: > - The project is

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

open swift/swiftclient patches to stable/kilo have been abandoned --John On 2 Jun 2016, at 4:45, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > Hi Tony, > > OpenStack-Ansible is just waiting for the requirements repository and the > swift repository kilo-eol tags. Once they're done we'd like to bump the > SHA's

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Hi Tony, OpenStack-Ansible is just waiting for the requirements repository and the swift repository kilo-eol tags. Once they're done we'd like to bump the SHA's for our 'kilo' to the EOL tags of those two repositories, tag a release, then do our own kilo-eol tag. Thanks, Jesse IRC: odyssey4me

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

I think all networking-* repos should EOL too, since they are plugins to neutron which is already EOL. I struggle to find a way that could maintain their gate without neutron. > On 02 Jun 2016, at 12:31, Tony Breeds wrote: > > Hi all, >In early May we tagged/EOL'd

[openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

Hi all, In early May we tagged/EOL'd several (13) projects. We'd like to do a final round for a more complete set. We looked for projects meet one or more of the following criteria: - The project is openstack-dev/devstack, openstack-dev/grenade or openstack/requirements - The project has