On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
> On 18-05-10 11:09:41, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> >
> > Awesome. Can someone submit a patch? It will need to remove the special
> URL
> > building for radosgw linked earlier in the thread, and add a reference to
> >
On 18-05-10 11:09:41, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Matthew Thode
> wrote:
>
> > On 18-05-09 15:14:37, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > > On 18-05-09 12:24:32, Clay Gerrard wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Thode <
> >
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
> On 18-05-09 15:14:37, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > On 18-05-09 12:24:32, Clay Gerrard wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Thode <
> prometheanf...@gentoo.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > *
On 18-05-09 15:14:37, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 18-05-09 12:24:32, Clay Gerrard wrote:
> > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Thode
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > * Proper fix would be to make ceph support the account field
> > >
> >
> > Is the
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Casey Bodley wrote:
>
> On 05/09/2018 11:40 AM, Casey Bodley wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/09/2018 11:22 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>>>
>>> python-swiftclient prior to 3.2.0 seemed to incidentally support radosgw
>>> tempurls. That is, there was no
On 05/09/2018 11:40 AM, Casey Bodley wrote:
On 05/09/2018 11:22 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
python-swiftclient prior to 3.2.0 seemed to incidentally support radosgw
tempurls. That is, there was no official support, but it still worked.
In 3.2.0 (specifically the linked commit(s)) tempurls were
On 18-05-09 12:24:32, Clay Gerrard wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Thode
> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Proper fix would be to make ceph support the account field
> >
>
> Is the 'rgw_swift_account_in_url' option not correct/sufficient?
>
I didn't see that
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Jim Rollenhagen
wrote:
>
> It works with both, see the link from earlier in the thread:
> https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/214b694f05d200ac1e2ce6db631546
> f2831c01f7/ironic/common/glance_service/v2/image_service.py#L152-L185
>
>
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Thode
> wrote:
>
>>
>> * Proper fix would be to make ceph support the account field
>>
>
> Is the 'rgw_swift_account_in_url' option not
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
>
> * Proper fix would be to make ceph support the account field
>
Is the 'rgw_swift_account_in_url' option not correct/sufficient?
> * Workaround would be to specify an old swiftclient to install (3.1.0,
>
On 18-05-09 13:42:02, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Matthew Thode
> wrote:
>
> > python-swiftclient prior to 3.2.0 seemed to incidentally support radosgw
> > tempurls. That is, there was no official support, but it still worked.
> >
> > In
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
> python-swiftclient prior to 3.2.0 seemed to incidentally support radosgw
> tempurls. That is, there was no official support, but it still worked.
>
> In 3.2.0 (specifically the linked commit(s)) tempurls were
On 05/09/2018 11:22 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
python-swiftclient prior to 3.2.0 seemed to incidentally support radosgw
tempurls. That is, there was no official support, but it still worked.
In 3.2.0 (specifically the linked commit(s)) tempurls were validated to
require
python-swiftclient prior to 3.2.0 seemed to incidentally support radosgw
tempurls. That is, there was no official support, but it still worked.
In 3.2.0 (specifically the linked commit(s)) tempurls were validated to
require /v1/account/container/object, which does not work with radosgw
as it
14 matches
Mail list logo