On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
Apologies for quoting again the top post of the thread.
Comments inline (mostly thinking aloud)
Salvatore
On 30 June 2014 22:22, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stackers,
Some recent ML threads [1] and a
-party-ci][neutron] What is
Success
exactly?
On 06/30/2014 09:13 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 06/30/2014 07:08 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 06/30/2014 04:22 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hi Stackers,
Some recent ML threads [1] and a hot IRC meeting today [2] brought
up some legitimate questions
On 07/03/2014 02:41 PM, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com
mailto:blak...@gmail.com wrote:
This allows the viewer to see categories of reviews based upon their
divergence from OpenStack's Jenkins results. I think evaluating
-Original Message-
From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info]
Sent: 01 July 2014 14:42
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party-ci][neutron] What is Success
exactly?
On 06/30/2014 09:13 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 06/30/2014 07:08 PM, Anita
Apologies for quoting again the top post of the thread.
Comments inline (mostly thinking aloud)
Salvatore
On 30 June 2014 22:22, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stackers,
Some recent ML threads [1] and a hot IRC meeting today [2] brought up some
legitimate questions around how a
On 07/03/2014 06:22 AM, Sullivan, Jon Paul wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info]
Sent: 01 July 2014 14:42
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party-ci][neutron] What is Success
exactly?
On 06/30/2014 09:13 PM
On 07/03/2014 07:12 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
Apologies for quoting again the top post of the thread.
Comments inline (mostly thinking aloud)
Salvatore
On 30 June 2014 22:22, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stackers,
Some recent ML threads [1] and a hot IRC meeting today
-Original Message-
From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info]
Sent: 03 July 2014 13:53
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party-ci][neutron] What is Success
exactly?
On 07/03/2014 06:22 AM, Sullivan, Jon Paul wrote:
-Original
On 07/03/2014 09:52 AM, Sullivan, Jon Paul wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info]
Sent: 03 July 2014 13:53
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party-ci][neutron] What is Success
exactly?
On 07/03/2014 06:22 AM
On 07/03/2014 10:31 AM, Sullivan, Jon Paul wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info]
Sent: 03 July 2014 15:06
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party-ci][neutron] What is Success
exactly?
I guess you missed
On 07/03/2014 01:27 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
This allows the viewer to see categories of reviews based upon their
divergence from OpenStack's Jenkins results. I think evaluating
divergence from Jenkins might be a metric worth consideration.
I think the only thing this really reflects though
Maybe we can require period checks against the head of the master
branch (which should always pass) and build statistics based on the results
of that. Otherwise it seems like we have to take a CI system's word for it
that a particular patch indeed broke that system.
--
Kevin Benton
On Thu, Jul
Yes, I can propose a spec for that. It probably won't be until Monday.
Is that okay?
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 07/03/2014 02:33 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
Maybe we can require period checks against the head of the master
branch (which should
Hi Stackers,
Some recent ML threads [1] and a hot IRC meeting today [2] brought up
some legitimate questions around how a newly-proposed Stackalytics
report page for Neutron External CI systems [2] represented the results
of an external CI system as successful or not.
First, I want to say
Hi Jay,
Couple of points.
I support the fact that we need to define what is success is.
I believe that the metrics that should be used are Voted +1 and
Skipped.
But to certain valid case, I would say that the Voted -1 is really
mostly a metric of bad health of a CI.
Most of the -1 are due to
On 06/30/2014 07:08 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 06/30/2014 04:22 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hi Stackers,
Some recent ML threads [1] and a hot IRC meeting today [2] brought up
some legitimate questions around how a newly-proposed Stackalytics
report page for Neutron External CI systems [2] represented
16 matches
Mail list logo
