Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Is it time to reconsider how we configure OVS bridges in the overcloud?

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Brent Eagles wrote: > To something like: > (triple configured) > - eth0 > - br-ctl - used as br-ex is currently used except neutron knows nothing > about it. > - br-ex -patched to br-ctl - ostensibly for external traffic and this is > what

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Is it time to reconsider how we configure OVS bridges in the overcloud?

Hi Dan, On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Dan Sneddon wrote: > ​ > > Brent, > > Thanks for taking the time to analyze this situation. I see a couple of > potential issues with the topology you are suggesting. > > First of all, what about the scenario where a system has only

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Is it time to reconsider how we configure OVS bridges in the overcloud?

On 11/10/2016 07:22 AM, Brent Eagles wrote: > Hi all, > > > A recent critical issue that has come up that has compelled me to > propose reconsidering our default and OVS based network configuration > examples : > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1640812 - Network connectivity > lost

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Is it time to reconsider how we configure OVS bridges in the overcloud?

Hi all, A recent critical issue that has come up that has compelled me to propose reconsidering our default and OVS based network configuration examples : https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1640812 - Network connectivity lost on node reboot I've been thinking about it for awhile, but you