On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12 2016, Corey Bryant wrote:
>
> > taskflow started using it recently, however it's only needed for a single
> > type in taskflow (JSONType). I'm wondering if it's worth the effort of
> > maintaining it and it's dependencies in
On Fri, Feb 12 2016, Corey Bryant wrote:
> taskflow started using it recently, however it's only needed for a single
> type in taskflow (JSONType). I'm wondering if it's worth the effort of
> maintaining it and it's dependencies in Ubuntu main or if perhaps we can
> just revert this bit to define
I'm fine with discarding it (since said support is only for posgres
anyway afaik), if it's causing issues for (packaging) folks and nobody
else in openstack really uses it either.
Let's see what folks think,
On another note (if not many projects are using it); I think it would be
nice to try
2016-02-12 21:57 GMT+01:00 Corey Bryant :
> Are any projects using sqlalchemy-utils?
>
> taskflow started using it recently, however it's only needed for a single
> type in taskflow (JSONType). I'm wondering if it's worth the effort of
> maintaining it and it's dependencies in Ubuntu main or if pe
Are any projects using sqlalchemy-utils?
taskflow started using it recently, however it's only needed for a single
type in taskflow (JSONType). I'm wondering if it's worth the effort of
maintaining it and it's dependencies in Ubuntu main or if perhaps we can
just revert this bit to define the JSO
