The question was never whether it could be made to do it (we'd have to
change it, but it's just code). The question was whether allowing extra
data was a good idea at all. If it's a real requirement, we just need a
patch to WSME to support it.
Doug
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Morgan Fainber
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Griffiths [mailto:kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 4:47 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] Undefined attributes in WSME
>
> FW
Yes, this feature is used in real deployments just as Yuriy described. I
really want to avoid a new API version since we're just now getting solidly
into V3 being used more extensively. Is it unreasonable to have wsme allow
"extra values" in some manner? (I think that is the crux, is it something
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Jamie Lennox wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 10:05 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> > What requirement(s) led to keystone supporting this feature?
>>
>> I've got no idea where the requirement came from howeve
FWIW, I believe Nova is looking at using JSON Schema as well, since they
need to handle API extensions. This came up during a design session at the
HK summit.
On 1/12/14, 5:33 PM, "Jamie Lennox" wrote:
>I would prefer not to have keystone using yet another framework from the
>rest of openstack
Hi Doug,
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 11:10 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] Undefined attributes in WSME
>
usage questions)
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] Undefined attributes in WSME
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > 2014/1/
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Jamie Lennox wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 10:05 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Jamie Lennox
> > wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 10:23 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
Hi Doug,
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:07 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] Undefined attributes in WSME
>
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 10:05 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Jamie Lennox
> wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 10:23 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Jamie Lennox
>
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> 2014/1/11 Doug Hellmann :
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Jamie Lennox
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there any way to have WSME pass through arbitrary attributes to the
> >> created object? There is nothing that i can see in t
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Jamie Lennox wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 10:23 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Jamie Lennox
> > wrote:
> > Is there any way to have WSME pass through arbitrary
> > attributes to the created object
Hi Doug,
2014/1/11 Doug Hellmann :
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Jamie Lennox
> wrote:
>>
>> Is there any way to have WSME pass through arbitrary attributes to the
>> created object? There is nothing that i can see in the documentation or code
>> that would seem to support this.
>>
>> In key
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 10:23 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Jamie Lennox
> wrote:
> Is there any way to have WSME pass through arbitrary
> attributes to the created object? There is nothing that i can
> see in the documentation or
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Jamie Lennox wrote:
> Is there any way to have WSME pass through arbitrary attributes to the
> created object? There is nothing that i can see in the documentation or
> code that would seem to support this.
>
> In keystone we have the situation where arbitrary data
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:16 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jamie Lennox wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to have WSME pass through arbitrary attributes to the
> > created object? There is nothing that i can see in the documentation or code
> > that would seem to support this.
> >
On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jamie Lennox wrote:
> Is there any way to have WSME pass through arbitrary attributes to the
> created object? There is nothing that i can see in the documentation or code
> that would seem to support this.
>
> In keystone we have the situation where arbitrary data was able to
Is there any way to have WSME pass through arbitrary attributes to the created
object? There is nothing that i can see in the documentation or code that would
seem to support this.
In keystone we have the situation where arbitrary data was able to be attached
to our resources. For example ther
18 matches
Mail list logo