Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

2013-10-08 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Rudra Thanks! Some questions and comments - name and fq_name How we use name and fq_name ? IMO, we should prevent to use shorten name. - src_ports: [80-80], For API consistency, we should use similar way of the security groups

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

2013-10-08 Thread Rudra Rugge
Hi Nachi, Please see inline: On Oct 8, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Rudra Thanks! Some questions and comments - name and fq_name How we use name and fq_name ? IMO, we should prevent to use shorten name. [Rudra] 'name' meets all the current Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

2013-10-07 Thread Rudra Rugge
Hi Nachi, I have split the spec for policy and VPN wiki served as a good reference point. Please review and provide comments: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprint-policy-extensions-for-neutron Thanks, Rudra On Oct 4, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: 2013/10/4 Rudra

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

2013-10-04 Thread Rudra Rugge
Hi All, The link in the email was incorrect. Please follow the following link: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipam-policy-extensions-for-neutron Thanks, Rudra On Oct 3, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Rudra Rugge rru...@juniper.netmailto:rru...@juniper.net wrote: Hi All, A blueprint has

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

2013-10-04 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Rudra Two comment from me (1) IPAM and Network policy extension looks like independent extension. so IPAM part and Network policy should be divided for two blueprints. (2) The team IPAM is too general word. IMO we should use more specific word. How about SubnetGroup? (3) Network Policy

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

2013-10-04 Thread Rudra Rugge
Hi Nachi, Inline response On 10/4/13 12:54 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Rudra inline responded 2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge rru...@juniper.net: Hi Nachi, Thanks for reviewing the BP. Please see inline: On 10/4/13 11:30 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Rudra Two comment

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

2013-10-04 Thread Nachi Ueno
2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge rru...@juniper.net: Hi Nachi, Inline response On 10/4/13 12:54 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Rudra inline responded 2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge rru...@juniper.net: Hi Nachi, Thanks for reviewing the BP. Please see inline: On 10/4/13 11:30 AM, Nachi Ueno

[openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

2013-10-03 Thread Rudra Rugge
Hi All, A blueprint has been registered to add IPAM and Policy extensions to Neutron. Please review the blueprint and the attached specification. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/juniper-contrail-ipam-policy-extensions-for-neutron All comments are welcome. Thanks, Rudra