Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2018-06-04 18:46:15 -0500:
> On 6/4/2018 4:20 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > See my comments on the other part of the thread, but I think this is too
> > optimistic until we add a couple of people to the review team on OSC.
> >
> > Others from the OSC team
On 6/4/2018 4:20 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
See my comments on the other part of the thread, but I think this is too
optimistic until we add a couple of people to the review team on OSC.
Others from the OSC team who have a better perspective on how much work
is actually left may have a different
Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2018-06-04 15:26:28 -0500:
> On 5/31/2018 3:59 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > We were also able to already identify some possible goals for the T cycle:
> >
> > - Move all CLIs to python-openstackclient
>
> My understanding was this is something we could
On 5/31/2018 3:59 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
We were also able to already identify some possible goals for the T cycle:
- Move all CLIs to python-openstackclient
My understanding was this is something we could do for Stein provided
some heavy refactoring in the SDK and OSC got done first in
Here's my attempt to recap the goal selection discussion we had last week at
the Forum. Feel free to correct any misstatements and continue the discussion.
For reference, here's the etherpad from the discussion:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-S-release-goals
Overall Goal Discussion
