On Apr 26, 2014, at 7:39 AM, Julio Carlos Barrera Juez
juliocarlos.barr...@i2cat.netmailto:juliocarlos.barr...@i2cat.net wrote:
I'm trying to configure any VPNaaS plugin in single-provider mode. I'm not able
to achieve this goal. I'm using a devstack installation and I'm editing
I'm trying to configure any VPNaaS plugin in single-provider mode. I'm not
able to achieve this goal. I'm using a devstack installation and I'm
editing */etc/neutron/neutron.conf* file, modifying this line:
...
OK, thank you guys, I understood that it was not possible to configure and
make work any VPNaaS plugin. I don't care, by now, because it works in
single-provider mode. I knew about the Cisco implementation, but I don't
know how to configure it, because I didn't find enough documentation about
that
Not sure I quite understand the question, but to configuring VPNaaS in single
provider mode, from a user’s perspective is the same (see
api.openstack.orghttp://api.openstack.org).
To bring up a cloud that uses a different vendor’s service and device driver,
you need to modify neutron.conf to
Hi Julio,
+1 for Paul's response. Multiple-provider VPNaaS support is delayed. But you
can take https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74156/ and
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74144/ as examples to write your own vpnaas
driver without multi-provider support. If any questions or problems in your
Hi.
After 8 months of the patch creation and being abandoned weeks ago (
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41827/) I still don't how can we develop a
VPNaaS plugin following Bo Lin instructions. Is there any other patch
trying to solve the problem? Is there any way to workaround the issue to
get a
Hi Julio
Unfortunately, we couldn't get forward about VPNaaS much in Icehouse.
We will discuss this design in next summit, so let's get this progress in
Juno.
2014-04-10 10:51 GMT-07:00 Julio Carlos Barrera Juez
juliocarlos.barr...@i2cat.net:
Hi.
After 8 months of the patch creation and
By not “working” do you mean you cannot get the plugin to work in a
multi-provider environment? Multi-provider solutions have been tabled until
Juno, where more discussion is occurring on what is the best way to support
different service providers.
However, you should be able to get the plugin
I'm following the change you pointed a week ago. It seems that it is
working now, and will be eventually approved soon. I will be happy when it
is approved.
Anyway, I need more information about how to develop a service driver and a
device driver for VPN plugin. I realize doing
Hi Julio,
You can take https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74156/ and
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74144/ as examples to write your own vpnaas
driver. More info about service type framework, you can also refer to
neutron/services/loadbalancer codes.
- Original Message -
From: Julio
Thank you very much Bo. I will try all your advices and check if it works!
[image: i2cat]
Julio C. Barrera Juez
Office phone: +34 93 357 99 27
Distributed Applications and Networks Area (DANA)
i2CAT Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
http://dana.i2cat.net
On 18 February 2014 09:18, Bo Lin
I wonder whether your neutron server codes have added the VPNaaS integration
with service type framework change on
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41827/21 , if not, the service_provider option
is useless. You need to include the change before developing your own driver.
QA (In my opinion
12 matches
Mail list logo
