Re: [openstack-dev] Long description of oslo.privsep

2016-01-15 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Haha, needs work :) -- Dims On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 01/16/2016 08:35 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> Zigo, >> >> Seriously, chill please. > > I was trying to write it funnily. Sorry if it wasn't obvious! :) > > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand

Re: [openstack-dev] Long description of oslo.privsep

2016-01-15 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Zigo, Seriously, chill please. the library is no where ready. It's not in global requirements either at the moment. the code quite a bit of time to go before we can switch over projects from oslo.rootwrap to oslo.privsep. We have check lists we that we go over before we let folks use it. Right

Re: [openstack-dev] Long description of oslo.privsep

2016-01-15 Thread Joshua Harlow
Hopefully the following helps out here. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/268377/ Gus or others hopefully can review that (and correct me if it's not the a good long description). -Josh Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, Lucky I have written, in the cookie-butter repo: Please feel here a long

Re: [openstack-dev] Long description of oslo.privsep

2016-01-15 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/16/2016 08:35 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Zigo, > > Seriously, chill please. I was trying to write it funnily. Sorry if it wasn't obvious! :) Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] Long description of oslo.privsep

2016-01-15 Thread Michael Still
I have just approved that review, as it moves the ball in the right direction. Michael On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Haha, needs work :) > > -- Dims > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > On 01/16/2016

[openstack-dev] Long description of oslo.privsep

2016-01-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, Lucky I have written, in the cookie-butter repo: Please feel here a long description which must be at least 3 lines wrapped on 80 cols, so that distribution package maintainers can use it in their packages. Note that this is a hard requirement. Because without it, we could see stuff like