To simply answer the question:
Yes I have experience about this specific matter of things as I’m now
working with the exact setup for more than 5 years. I’m even exclusively
working remotely with some studios of my employer.
It’s not that expensive as long as you get correct rules, hardware and
On 2018-03-08 02:18 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
Fully agree with Doug. At CERN, we use video conferencing for 100s, sometimes
>1000 participants for the LHC experiments, the trick we've found is to fully
embrace the chat channels (so remote non-native English speakers can provide
input) and
On 2018-03-08 01:24 PM, Jay S Bryant wrote:
On 3/8/2018 12:22 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 2018-03-08 09:03 AM, Jens Harbott wrote:
With the current PTG just finished and seeing discussions happen about
the format of the next[0], it seems that the advantages of these seem
to be pretty clear to
Fully agree with Doug. At CERN, we use video conferencing for 100s, sometimes
>1000 participants for the LHC experiments, the trick we've found is to fully
embrace the chat channels (so remote non-native English speakers can provide
input) and chairs/vectors who can summarise the remote
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2018-03-08 18:34:51 +:
> On 2018-03-08 12:16:18 -0600 (-0600), Jay S Bryant wrote:
> [...]
> > Cinder has been doing this for many years and it has worked
> > relatively well. It requires a good remote speaker and it also
> > requires the people in the
On 8 March 2018 at 18:16, Jay S Bryant wrote:
> Cinder has been doing this for many years and it has worked relatively well.
> It requires a good remote speaker and it also requires the people in the
> room to be sensitive to the needs of those who are remote. I.E. planning
Jens Harbott wrote:
> With the current PTG just finished and seeing discussions happen about
> the format of the next[0], it seems that the advantages of these seem
> to be pretty clear to most, so let me use the occasion to remind
> everyone of the disadvantages.
<…>
> So when you are
On 2018-03-08 12:16:18 -0600 (-0600), Jay S Bryant wrote:
[...]
> Cinder has been doing this for many years and it has worked
> relatively well. It requires a good remote speaker and it also
> requires the people in the room to be sensitive to the needs of
> those who are remote. I.E. planning
On 3/8/2018 12:22 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 2018-03-08 09:03 AM, Jens Harbott wrote:
With the current PTG just finished and seeing discussions happen about
the format of the next[0], it seems that the advantages of these seem
to be pretty clear to most, so let me use the occasion to remind
On 2018-03-08 09:03 AM, Jens Harbott wrote:
With the current PTG just finished and seeing discussions happen about
the format of the next[0], it seems that the advantages of these seem
to be pretty clear to most, so let me use the occasion to remind
everyone of the disadvantages.
Every meeting
On 3/8/2018 12:06 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2018-03-08 17:49:35 + (+), Flint WALRUS wrote:
Pretty easy, put the PTG online with a livestream on
YouTube/Hangout/whatever platform that will then be saved and could even be
watched later on!
It’s just a matter of some hardware and a
On 08/03/18 18:06, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2018-03-08 17:49:35 + (+), Flint WALRUS wrote:
>> Pretty easy, put the PTG online with a livestream on
>> YouTube/Hangout/whatever platform that will then be saved and could even be
>> watched later on!
>>
>> It’s just a matter of some hardware
On 2018-03-08 17:49:35 + (+), Flint WALRUS wrote:
> Pretty easy, put the PTG online with a livestream on
> YouTube/Hangout/whatever platform that will then be saved and could even be
> watched later on!
>
> It’s just a matter of some hardware and a decent internet bandwidth that’s
>
Yes! In the past I have helped a few different projects set up a way to do
a hangout that live streams to youtube so people can join the conversation
actively or passively depending on their involvement. I actually helped
write a blog post about it as well[1]. Cinder has been doing it for a few
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Flint WALRUS wrote:
> Pretty easy, put the PTG online with a livestream on
> YouTube/Hangout/whatever platform that will then be saved and could even be
> watched later on!
+1
I think that we can work out a solution so that every room at
Pretty easy, put the PTG online with a livestream on
YouTube/Hangout/whatever platform that will then be saved and could even be
watched later on!
It’s just a matter of some hardware and a decent internet bandwidth that’s
already available to almost every places where a PTG took place.
Problem
With the current PTG just finished and seeing discussions happen about
the format of the next[0], it seems that the advantages of these seem
to be pretty clear to most, so let me use the occasion to remind
everyone of the disadvantages.
Every meeting that is happening is excluding those
17 matches
Mail list logo