Jimmy McArthur wrote:
Hmm...
http://antirez.com/news/120
Today a page about the new Creative Common license in the Redis Labs web
site was interpreted as if Redis itself switched license. This is not
the case, Redis is, and will remain, BSD licensed. However in the fake
news era my attempts
Hmm...
http://antirez.com/news/120
Today a page about the new Creative Common license in the Redis Labs web
site was interpreted as if Redis itself switched license. This is not
the case, Redis is, and will remain, BSD licensed. However in the fake
news era my attempts to provide the correct
Haïkel wrote:
I haven't seen this but I'd like to point that Redis moved to an open
core licensing model.
https://redislabs.com/community/commons-clause/
In short:
* base engine remains under BSD license
* modules move to ASL 2.0 + commons clause which is non-free
(prohibits sales of derived
Hi,
I haven't seen this but I'd like to point that Redis moved to an open
core licensing model.
https://redislabs.com/community/commons-clause/
In short:
* base engine remains under BSD license
* modules move to ASL 2.0 + commons clause which is non-free
(prohibits sales of derived products)