Re: [openstack-dev] Targeting icehouse-eol?

2015-06-16 Thread Alan Pevec
> let's release this last one (codename: Farewell ?) point release. I > can do this next week after we finish pending reviews. Remaining stable/icehouse reviews[1] have -2 or -1 except https://review.openstack.org/176019 which I've asked neutron-stable-maint to review. Matt, anything else before w

Re: [openstack-dev] Targeting icehouse-eol?

2015-06-04 Thread Alan Pevec
>>> The only open question I have is if we need to do an Icehouse point release >>> prior to the tag and dropping the branch, but I don't think that's happened >>> in the past with branch end of life - the eol tag basically serves as the >>> placeholder to the last 'release'. >> >> I don't think we

Re: [openstack-dev] Targeting icehouse-eol?

2015-06-04 Thread Thierry Carrez
Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 09:06:29AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> Following on the thread about no longer doing stable point releases [1] at >> the summit we talked about doing icehouse-eol pretty soon [2]. >> >> I scrubbed the open stable/icehouse patches last week and w

Re: [openstack-dev] Targeting icehouse-eol?

2015-06-03 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 09:06:29AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Following on the thread about no longer doing stable point releases [1] at > the summit we talked about doing icehouse-eol pretty soon [2]. > > I scrubbed the open stable/icehouse patches last week and we're down to at > least one s

[openstack-dev] Targeting icehouse-eol?

2015-06-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
Following on the thread about no longer doing stable point releases [1] at the summit we talked about doing icehouse-eol pretty soon [2]. I scrubbed the open stable/icehouse patches last week and we're down to at least one screen of changes now [3]. My thinking was once we've processed that l