Re: [openstack-dev] bug/129135

2014-04-01 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Nathanael Burton wrote: > Also, how does this work for RHEL-based distros where they tend to backport > new kernel features? For instance vxlan support was added in the kernel for > RHEL6.5 which is 2.6.32-based... That changeset looks like it breaks > Neutron fo

Re: [openstack-dev] bug/129135

2014-04-01 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:07 PM, wrote: > > openstack-dev, > > A question about the fix from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82931 > > After this fix, the neutron code now explicitly checks for kernel > version 3.13- was this deliberate? (I was using an older 3.11 version > before, and did not

Re: [openstack-dev] bug/129135

2014-03-31 Thread Tom Fifield
Yes, that does seem odd. See also related Documentation bugs and patch: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1273412 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/81858/ Regards, Tom On 01/04/14 03:42, Nathanael Burton wrote: Also, how does this work for RHEL-based distros where they tend to

Re: [openstack-dev] bug/129135

2014-03-31 Thread Nathanael Burton
Also, how does this work for RHEL-based distros where they tend to backport new kernel features? For instance vxlan support was added in the kernel for RHEL6.5 which is 2.6.32-based... That changeset looks like it breaks Neutron for ovs + vxlan on RHEL distros. Nate On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:0

[openstack-dev] bug/129135

2014-03-31 Thread sowmini . varadhan
openstack-dev, A question about the fix from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82931 After this fix, the neutron code now explicitly checks for kernel version 3.13- was this deliberate? (I was using an older 3.11 version before, and did not seem to have any issues before this change). Is there a