Re: [openstack-dev] using feature branches, Swift's experiences

2016-07-19 Thread John Dickinson
On 19 Jul 2016, at 11:56, Dean Troyer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:27 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > >> Overall, using long-lived upstream feature branches has been very helpful >> for us and overall a positive experience. >> >> I've seen some other teams debate and discuss

Re: [openstack-dev] using feature branches, Swift's experiences

2016-07-19 Thread Dean Troyer
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:27 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > Overall, using long-lived upstream feature branches has been very helpful > for us and overall a positive experience. > > I've seen some other teams debate and discuss using a feature branch for > their work but wonder about

[openstack-dev] using feature branches, Swift's experiences

2016-07-19 Thread John Dickinson
Swift has now used 4 feature branches and landed 3 of them: * feature/sp -- for storage policy functionality (landed) * feature/ec -- for erasure codes (landed) * feature/hummingbird -- for golang WIP * feature/crypto -- for at-rest encryption (landed) Overall, using long-lived upstream