Hi
I will be interested as well. Having these playbooks in ansible can also
be useful
in order to integrate with infra-ansible project.
I really see that collection as a valid alternative for puppet modules,
with the advantages
that ansible can provide, but of course that moving from puppet to
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 09:31:47AM +0200, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote:
> Hi
> I will be interested as well. Having these playbooks in ansible can also be
> useful
> in order to integrate with infra-ansible project.
> I really see that collection as a valid alternative for puppet modules, with
> the
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 06:50:38PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>
> On 09/08/2015 10:57 AM, Paul Belanger wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I wanted to start a discussion about the future of ansible / ansible roles
> > in
> > OpenStack. Over the last week or so I've started down the ansible
I'm interested in ansible roles for openstack-infra, but as there is
overlap in functionality
with the current openstack-infra puppet roles I'm not sure what's the
stance from the
openstack-infra core members and PTL.
I think they should go to openstack-infra, since Nodepoo/Zuul/etc are very
On 09/08/2015 10:57 AM, Paul Belanger wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I wanted to start a discussion about the future of ansible / ansible roles in
> OpenStack. Over the last week or so I've started down the ansible path,
> starting
> my first ansible role; I've started with ansible-role-nodepool[1].
On 09/08/2015 09:57 AM, Paul Belanger wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I wanted to start a discussion about the future of ansible / ansible roles in
> OpenStack. Over the last week or so I've started down the ansible path,
> starting
> my first ansible role; I've started with ansible-role-nodepool[1].
>
Hi Paul,
We'd love to collaborate on improving openstack-ansible and getting our
OpenStack roles into the general big tent and out of our monolithic repository.
We have a proposal in review for moving our roles out of our main repository
and into separate repositories [0] making
