through the
murano API for everything (which ultimately is probably a good thing).
*From:* Stan Lagun [mailto:sla...@mirantis.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, July 20, 2014 5:42 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Image tagging
...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 5:42 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Image tagging
Hi!
I think it would be usefull to share the original vision on tagging that we had
back in 0.4 era when it was introduced
).
*From:* Stan Lagun [mailto:sla...@mirantis.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, July 20, 2014 5:42 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Image tagging
Hi!
I think it would be usefull to share the original vision on tagging that
we
Hi!
I think it would be usefull to share the original vision on tagging that we
had back in 0.4 era when it was introduced.
Tagging was supposed to be JSON image metadata with extendable scheme.
Workflow should be able to both utilize that metadata and impose some
constraints on it. That feature