On 3/18/15, 9:12 PM, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com wrote:
My hope is that either the new IPAM subsystem for subnet allocations
would provide this, or that a small API extension could paper over some
of the sharper edges.
In IPAM we have added this concept of a subnet request. The
Following discussion on IRC, a patch is now up to add this config option.
Reviews appreciated.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166973/
Cheers,
John
On 23/03/2015 18:11, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, John Davidge (jodavidg)
jodav...@cisco.com
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, John Davidge (jodavidg)
jodav...@cisco.com wrote:
The above blueprint outlines an admin-configurable global default pool to
be used in the case of a user calling subnet-create without specifying a
CIDR or subnet-pool ID. If the OpenStack environment has been
Going forward, I think the best approach for PD would be to align with the
subnet-pools being added by the subnet allocation BP work (thanks to Sean
for bringing this to our attention again).
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/kilo/subnet-alloca
tion.html#rest-api-impact
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:45:59AM PDT, John Davidge (jodavidg) wrote:
In the IPv6 meeting yesterday you mentioned doing this
with an extension rather than modifying the core API. Could you go into
some detail about how
Copying my response on the review below:
Yes that completely makes sense Sean. In our original proposal we wanted
to allow the user to initiate a subnet-create without providing a CIDR,
and have an 'ipv6_pd_enabled' flag which could be set in the API call to
tell Neutron that this particular
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:45:59AM PDT, John Davidge (jodavidg) wrote:
In the IPv6 meeting yesterday you mentioned doing this
with an extension rather than modifying the core API. Could you go into
some detail about how you see this extension looking?
The easiest, is to evaluate the REST API
