@lists.openstack.org
Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 7:30 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule
- comapre_type values
Making sure all drivers support the features
: Thursday, July 3, 2014 3:30 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule -
comapre_type values
I also don't think it is fair
I think the API should provide an richly featured interface, and individual
drivers should indicate if they support the provided configuration. For
example there is a spec for a Linux LVS LBaaS driver, this driver would not
support TLS termination or any layer 7 features, but would still be
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7 Rule -
comapre_type values
I think the API should provide an richly featured interface, and individual
drivers should indicate if they support the provided configuration
be fully compatible with the interface it implements.
Avishay
*From:* Dustin Lundquist [mailto:dus...@null-ptr.net]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 24, 2014 5:41 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching
with the interface it implements.
Avishay
*From:* Dustin Lundquist [mailto:dus...@null-ptr.net]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 24, 2014 5:41 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Layer7 Switching - L7
Rule - comapre_type values
