On 01/25/2017 06:16 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
I have quibble with the current microversions construct. It's mostly
semantic in nature, and I _think_ it's not valid/useful - but I'm going
to describe it here just so that I've said it and we can all acknowledge
it and move on.
My concern is with
On 01/25/2017 09:16 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 01/24/2017 12:39 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017, Sean Dague wrote:
>>
>>> We all inherited a bunch of odd and poorly defined behaviors in the
>>> system we're using. They were made because at the time they seemed like
>>> reasonable
On 01/24/2017 12:39 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017, Sean Dague wrote:
>
>> We all inherited a bunch of odd and poorly defined behaviors in the
>> system we're using. They were made because at the time they seemed like
>> reasonable tradeoffs, and a couple of years later we learned
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017, Thierry Carrez wrote:
We were discussing this in the context of an "assert" tag, not a goal.
Yes, but it is often the case that changes are being evaluated as if
it was a goal. A couple of glance related changes experienced
reactions of "this doesn't meet compatibility
Chris Dent wrote:
> [...]
> That could very well be fine, but we have evidence that:
>
> * some projects don't yet use microversions in their APIs
> * some projects have no intention of using microversions or at least
> have internal conflict about doing so
> * some projects would like to
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017, Sean Dague wrote:
We all inherited a bunch of odd and poorly defined behaviors in the
system we're using. They were made because at the time they seemed like
reasonable tradeoffs, and a couple of years later we learned more, or
needed to address a different use case that
On 01/23/2017 08:11 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Chris Dent wrote:
>
>> The review starts with the original text. The hope is that
>> commentary here in this thread and on the review will eventually
>> lead to the best document.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421846
>
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Chris Dent wrote:
The review starts with the original text. The hope is that
commentary here in this thread and on the review will eventually
lead to the best document.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421846
There's been a bit of commentary on the review which I'll
