On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:00 PM Jon Schlueter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> > On 10/04/2017 07:23 AM, Boden Russell wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/3/17 1:37 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> >>> The partial rollback of Zuulv3 is in place now.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/04/2017 07:23 AM, Boden Russell wrote:
>>
>> On 10/3/17 1:37 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>>> The partial rollback of Zuulv3 is in place now. Zuulv2 is acting as your
>>> gate keeper once again.
>>
>> Since the rollback, one of
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 12:23 PM Boden Russell wrote:
>
> On 10/3/17 1:37 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> > The partial rollback of Zuulv3 is in place now. Zuulv2 is acting as your
> > gate keeper once again.
>
> Since the rollback, one of the neutron-lib (v2) jobs has been
>
And we find following error in heat's zuulv2 jobs [1]:
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pthread -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fPIC
-DUSE__THREAD -DHAVE_SYNC_SYNCHRONIZE
On 10/04/2017 07:23 AM, Boden Russell wrote:
>
> On 10/3/17 1:37 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>> The partial rollback of Zuulv3 is in place now. Zuulv2 is acting as your
>> gate keeper once again.
>
> Since the rollback, one of the neutron-lib (v2) jobs has been
> consistently failing [1] with:
>
>
On 10/3/17 1:37 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> The partial rollback of Zuulv3 is in place now. Zuulv2 is acting as your
> gate keeper once again.
Since the rollback, one of the neutron-lib (v2) jobs has been
consistently failing [1] with:
c/_cffi_backend.c:15:17: fatal error: ffi.h: No such file or
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:37 PM Monty Taylor wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> The partial rollback of Zuulv3 is in place now. Zuulv2 is acting as your
> gate keeper once again. The status page for Zuulv2 can be found at
> http://status.openstack.org/zuul and Zuulv3 can be found at