On 15/04/15 09:09 -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 19:54 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/14/2015 07:26 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ken Giusti wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmannd...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua
- Original Message -
From: Ken Giusti kgiu...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 4:47:50 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] QPID incompatible with python 3 and
untested
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-15 15:10:54 -0400:
On 04/15/2015 01:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
It's time to be honest about the level of
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ken Giusti wrote:
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used for
the qpid:// transport (aka rpc_backend).
I ask because I'm
On 2015-04-15 11:53:28 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
When I proposed removing the GridFS driver from glance_store, I asked
for feedback in other mailing lists and then came back here proposing
de dev removal.
Got it--so the recommendation is to not ask the developer community
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 19:54 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/14/2015 07:26 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And I'd
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
On 04/14/2015 07:26 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
other backends, deprecate the plugability, and move on to more
interesting problems.
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ken Giusti wrote:
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-04-15 10:48:30 -0700:
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
other
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ken Giusti wrote:
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the
On 04/14/2015 08:21 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Sean Dague wrote:
It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
other backends, deprecate the plugability, and move on to more
interesting problems. We do have plenty of them to solve. :) Perhaps in
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 11:02:34 -0700:
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-04-15 10:48:30 -0700:
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
It's time to be
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 14:08:57 -0400:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com
wrote:
Ken
On 04/15/2015 01:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
other backends, deprecate the plugability,
Ken Giusti wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmannd...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlowharlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ken Giusti wrote:
Just to be clear: you're asking
As a result of all of the excellent discussions here, I have produced a
spec for policy which I think will assist us all in moving forward on
improving the quality in this space:
https://review.openstack.org/174105
Thanks everyone for your excellent replies!
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message
On 14/04/15 19:54 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/14/2015 07:26 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And I'd recommend subscribing to
On 15/04/15 00:04 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:26:21 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And I'd recommend
On 04/14/2015 07:26 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And I'd recommend subscribing to it... it's really quite good! He
did
On 2015-04-15 01:26:21 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And I'd recommend subscribing to it... it's really quite
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Sean Dague wrote:
It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
other backends, deprecate the plugability, and move on to more
interesting problems. We do have plenty of them to solve. :) Perhaps in
doing so we could get a better Rabbit
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used for
the qpid:// transport (aka rpc_backend).
I ask because I'm maintaining the AMQP 1.0 driver (transport
amqp://) that can also be used with qpidd.
However, the AMQP
On 4/14/2015 12:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hello! There's been some recent progress on python3 compatibility for
core libraries that OpenStack depends on[1], and this is likely to open
the flood gates for even more python3 problems to be found and fixed.
Recently a proposal was made to make
On 04/14/2015 01:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hello! There's been some recent progress on python3 compatibility for
core libraries that OpenStack depends on[1], and this is likely to open
the flood gates for even more python3 problems to be found and fixed.
Recently a proposal was made to make
Ken Giusti wrote:
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used for
the qpid:// transport (aka rpc_backend).
I ask because I'm maintaining the AMQP 1.0 driver (transport
amqp://) that can also be used with
Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2015-04-14 13:13:47 -0700:
On 4/14/2015 12:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hello! There's been some recent progress on python3 compatibility for
core libraries that OpenStack depends on[1], and this is likely to open
the flood gates for even more
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-14 12:54:20 -0700:
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used for
the qpid:// transport (aka rpc_backend).
I ask because I'm maintaining the AMQP 1.0 driver
rdo packstack deploys rabbit these days too.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Clint Byrum [cl...@fewbar.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 3:20 PM
To: openstack-dev
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] QPID incompatible with python 3 and
untested in gate -- what to do?
On 14/04/15 10:22 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hello! There's been some recent progress on python3 compatibility for
core libraries that OpenStack depends on[1], and this is likely to open
the flood gates for even more python3 problems to be found and fixed.
Recently a proposal was made to make
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And I'd recommend subscribing to it... it's really quite good! He
did (twice apparently, I expect the second by mistake):
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And I'd recommend subscribing to it... it's really quite good! He
did (twice apparently, I expect the second by mistake):
33 matches
Mail list logo
